Curaçao Prime Minister Pisas steps in to oversee gambling regulator
Prime Minister of Curaçao, Gilmar Pisas, has assumed control of the Curaçao Gaming Authority following the resignation of its board of commissioners in mid-September.
The resignations of commissioners Shelwyn Salesia, Robert Reijnaert, and Ildefons Simon left the regulator without formal supervision.
No new appointments have been announced since, and the gambling regulator now reports directly to the Prime Minister’s Office.
This change comes amid ongoing political tensions within the government. Finance Minister Javier Silvania, under whose remit the regulator officially falls, was not present at a recent meeting between the Prime Minister and Curaçao Gaming Authority management.
Minister Silvania is also facing internal party disputes and allegations of misconduct.
The situation has cast uncertainty over planned regulatory reforms to strengthen transparency and oversight of the online gambling industry.
The gambling sector contributes significantly to Curaçao’s public finances, and the launch of the Curaçao Gaming Authority in July, to replace the former Gaming Control Board, aimed to strengthen the nation’s reputation as an international gambling regulator.
However, three months after its launch, the Authority has yet to be formally registered as a foundation, and it remains unclear which branch of government will oversee it in the long term.
Verticals:
Sectors:
Topics:
Dig Deeper
Related stories
The Backstory
A fast-moving regulatory fight
The current flashpoint over event contracts did not arrive overnight. The debate has simmered at the intersection of finance and gambling regulation as startups and crypto platforms tried to package sports and political outcomes as tradable derivatives, while state gaming overseers warned of a work-around to sportsbook rules. Pressure escalated in recent weeks as federal commodities regulators publicly scrutinized new offerings and state officials urged Congress to step in. Platforms that framed outcome trading as a financial product now face a tougher path to scale, and the industry is adjusting strategy on the fly.
That tension broke into view when Robinhood rolled back plans for a Pro Football Championship market after the Commodity Futures Trading Commission pressed its partner, Kalshi, and crypto exchange Crypto.com to explain how sports contracts comply with derivatives law. Robinhood had announced the product days ahead of the Super Bowl, then pivoted after the CFTC’s outreach, underscoring how fast federal oversight can reshape go-to-market plans. The company said only a sliver of users had access and offered to let them close positions or hold through resolution, signaling caution even as it vowed to keep working with the agency on a broader event contracts platform this year.
Crypto.com, by contrast, indicated it would proceed with its Super Bowl events contracts, arguing the CFTC is the proper federal referee to impose market integrity and national availability. The split illustrates the high stakes: firms courting mainstream investors have more to lose from regulatory missteps than crypto-native players, yet both are testing the boundary between wagers and derivatives in a legal gray zone that invites a crackdown.
State-federal tensions rise
State regulators say the gray zone cuts into consumer protections they built since the 2018 sports betting ramp-up. In Pennsylvania, Executive Director Kevin O’Toole urged the state’s congressional delegation to press the CFTC, warning that self-certified sports contracts could create a back door to wagering without the guardrails required of licensed sportsbooks. The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board’s letter to lawmakers contended that the derivatives framework is tailored to institutional markets, not mass-market betting, and flagged risks around responsible gaming, match-fixing and insider abuse.
The board’s concerns build on testimony it filed with the CFTC in April. The agency’s self-certification process places the initial compliance burden on exchanges, with limited prelaunch review. That creates friction with states that license and monitor sportsbooks, require operators to enforce age limits and geolocation, and coordinate with leagues on integrity protocols. Pennsylvania warned that consumers could confuse federally framed “markets” with Wall Street-grade protections while encountering something closer to an unregulated betting venue. The agency linked its letter publicly, underscoring transparency in its plea to Congress; the document is posted by the gaming board here.
The political stakes are rising as well. Prediction market platform Polymarket has signaled plans to relaunch in the United States, betting that federal rules can be navigated and demand will surge in an election year and major sports calendar. If more platforms push into sports or political outcomes under derivatives law, expect additional state boards to seek congressional clarity or court review to defend their turf.
Platforms test limits, learn constraints
The CFTC’s message to Kalshi and Crypto.com, and Robinhood’s swift pullback, signal that even well-capitalized firms face uncertain timelines when trying to list sports outcomes as derivatives. Firms have argued such contracts hedge fan engagement or business risks and deepen financial literacy. Regulators counter that the products look like wagers, not hedges, and are marketed to retail users who may not grasp the risks or differences from a sportsbook bet. That debate will define who can offer these markets, to whom and under what controls.
The practical impact is immediate. Product road maps are shifting as legal teams model scenarios ranging from stricter CFTC scrutiny to joint oversight with states. Crypto platforms willing to accept narrower distribution or offshore users may move faster, but they could face enforcement if they cross U.S. lines. Meanwhile, traditional sportsbooks watch closely: a federally sanctioned alternative could siphon volume or push promotional costs higher, yet a clampdown could preserve the status quo and their regulatory moat.
Regulatory flux is not just a U.S. story
The oversight scramble extends beyond U.S. borders. In Curaçao, a key hub for online gambling licenses, the prime minister stepped in to oversee the regulator after the board of commissioners resigned, leaving no formal supervision. The Curaçao Gaming Authority’s leadership vacuum has raised fresh doubts about reforms meant to strengthen transparency and the island’s international standing. Finance Minister Javier Silvania, who typically oversees the regulator, has faced political disputes and missed a recent meeting with the authority’s management. Three months after the authority’s launch, it had yet to be formally registered as a foundation, clouding which branch of government will direct it. For operators reliant on Curaçao licenses, the uncertainty complicates compliance planning and bank relationships.
These governance strains matter to U.S. debates. If offshore venues become less predictable, pressure grows on domestic regulators and exchanges to define clear pathways for compliant products. Conversely, if offshore hubs tighten oversight, they may bolster arguments for harmonized standards and lessen arbitrage opportunities that invite gray-market activity.
Leadership churn reshapes strategy
Industry leaders are also recalibrating under regulatory pressure and shifting economics. At Entain, Gavin Isaacs stepped down as chief executive after five months, with Chair Stella David returning as interim CEO. The company said it is tracking toward the top end of 2024 EBITDA guidance and is focused on operational discipline and shareholder value. The change echoes broader consolidation and governance moves across gaming. Read more on Entain’s leadership transition and its implications for BetMGM, the U.S. joint venture with MGM Resorts.
At the supplier level, Boldplay’s longtime chief executive, Valli Fragoso, exited following the studio’s acquisition by Openbox Holdings Group. Openbox praised her role in building a content slate and global partnerships and framed the change as a way to sharpen focus in 2025. The company expects to leverage synergies to expand distribution. Details are in Boldplay CEO and Director steps down. Leadership shifts like these often precede refreshed product priorities and market entries, especially as operators demand content that fits stricter regulatory guardrails and more disciplined return thresholds.
Brazil’s pull and the next frontiers
As U.S. and European markets mature, companies seek growth in Latin America, where regulation is taking shape and consumer demand is strong. Philippine technology group DigiPlus is leaning into Brazil after securing a license, naming market veteran Graham Tidey as country manager to steer entry and compliance. The appointment, outlined in DigiPlus names Graham Tidey to oversee Brazil, signals a commitment to local partnerships and responsible gaming guardrails. Brazil’s framework is still evolving, but the opportunity is sizable, and early movers aim to set standards that anticipate tighter rules.
The crosscurrents are clear. Event contracts challenge old lines between trading and wagering. State and federal authorities are jockeying for primacy as new products arrive. Offshore jurisdictions are remaking their regulators, while global operators swap leaders and pivot to high-growth markets like Brazil. The outcome will shape how consumers bet, how investors hedge and how regulators draw the map of permissible risk. For now, firms are advancing with caution, and the rulebook is being written in real time.
