Missouri sports betting tax revenue hits US$1.2 million

Ziv Chen

10 April 2026 at 7:44am UTC-4

Source: Shutterstock

Email, LinkedIn, and more

Sports betting operators in Missouri generated over US$1.2 million in tax revenue in February, more than the combined revenue from December and January.

Figures released by the Missouri Gaming Commission show that February’s revenue passed the combined total of US$660,000 for the first two months of legal sports betting.

Article continues below ad

The monthly report also shows that the increase in tax revenue came despite a fall in overall wagers. Missouri bettors placed US$277 million in wagers in February, which is the lowest monthly total so far, down 49% from December’s figure and down 28% from January’s.

Sportsbooks in Missouri are permitted to use promotional bets to reduce their taxable income, and analysts believe that this has led to lower or no tax payments in the first two months since the market launched.

The President of sports analytics company SBRnet, Neil Schwartz, said it was common for sportsbooks to operate at a loss for several months after legalization, during which time they typically offer widespread promotions to attract customers.

Article continues below ad

According to the February figures, parlays were the most profitable betting category, generating more than US$21 million in revenue, while basketball wagers followed, producing nearly US$6 million.

The top-earning sportsbooks for the month were FanDuel (US$5.9 million), DraftKings (US$4.8 million), and BetMGM (US$400,000).

On the other end of the spectrum, Fanatics, Bet365, and Century Casino showed negative adjusted gross revenue.

View Ziv Chen's bio and articles.

Locations:

Verticals:

Sports Betting

Sectors:

Topics:

Dig Deeper

The Backstory

How Missouri’s early returns set the stage

Missouri’s sports betting market is only months old, but its tax picture is already shifting. After muted state collections at launch, February produced a noticeable bump, signaling the market’s transition from expensive customer acquisition to steadier revenue. The first weeks were dominated by heavy promotional spending that suppressed taxable income, a common pattern when sportsbooks prioritize sign-ups over profits. By February, operators began pulling back on giveaways, which lifted taxable winnings despite a decline in total wagers. That divergence — lower handle but higher taxes — is a hallmark of a market moving off launch incentives and toward normalized margins.

The movement comes after two formative developments shaped the industry’s opening act. First, operators with national scale quickly seized share, concentrating handle and early profits among the largest brands. Second, the licensing framework produced a mix of untethered mobile books and team or casino partnerships that gave big operators multiple ways to enter the state. Those choices continue to influence who wins market share, which bets generate the bulk of revenue, and how much of it becomes taxable.

The result by late winter: promotional expenses receded, parlay margins held, and the state’s receipts rose even as bettors wagered less than they did in December and January. For lawmakers and budget officials, that means the baseline for monthly tax flows is likely moving higher — a critical shift after a debut when collections underwhelmed relative to public expectations.

Promotions retreat, parlays carry the margins

Promotional credits were the defining feature of Missouri’s opening months, effectively shrinking sportsbooks’ adjusted gross revenue and flattening tax payments. Operators often accept initial losses in new states to build user bases and lock in loyalty before throttling back. That pattern is visible in the early Missouri data, where February’s higher tax take contrasted with a lighter overall betting volume. The turn suggests operators are right-sizing offers and leaning harder on profitable bet types.

Parlays, in particular, have underpinned early house wins. High-margin same-game and multi-leg bets reliably fatten hold percentages, and Missouri has been no exception. As promotional intensity wanes, parlay mix becomes an even more important driver of taxable revenue because operators record a larger share of those wins rather than netting them out with free bet expenses. That dynamic also helps explain why state coffers can grow even when headline handle falls — the composition of bets matters as much as the quantity.

Other states’ experiences reinforce the pattern. In Massachusetts, a mature but still competitive market, April brought a sizable lift in operator revenue and taxes as power players leaned on high-yield products and steadier customer cohorts. The state reported US$65.4 million in monthly sportsbook revenue and US$13.2 million in taxes, with DraftKings outpacing FanDuel after a 42% year-on-year jump. While the Bay State’s tax structure and operator mix differ, the underlying mechanics — fewer blanket giveaways, a strong parlay mix, and consolidation at the top — are instructive for Missouri’s next chapters.

Power players define the early Missouri market

Market concentration has been striking from the start. In the first two months of legal betting, DraftKings and FanDuel captured roughly 73% of handle and booked about US$120 million in combined profit, according to state data compiled at the time. Their dominance was not an accident. Both brands poured millions into the 2024 ballot campaign to legalize sports wagering and then into marketing at launch, reinforcing national playbooks that prize scale and rapid customer onboarding.

The duo’s heavy spend drew criticism from opponents who questioned whether large out-of-state operators would deliver meaningful fiscal benefits for Missouri in the near term. Through the first two months, sports betting generated about US$659,000 in taxes — a tepid take that fueled skepticism. February’s step-up in collections, however, shows how quickly the picture can change once promo burn moderates and operators bank a larger share of their gross wins.

The balance of competition also matters. Smaller and specialized books can shape pricing and product depth, but their ability to dent the top two’s share is limited without sustained investment. Missouri’s early read resembles several other states in which two or three brands command most activity, especially online, while niche operators compete on odds, VIP service or unique bet menus. That pecking order helps explain both the profitability profile and the pace at which tax collections improve.

How Missouri’s take compares across state lines

Benchmarking Missouri against peers helps frame expectations. In Iowa, a more mature mobile market with a broad roster of books, February online handle reached about US$203.5 million with US$20.9 million in net receipts. Handle edged down year over year, but operator net rose, reflecting tighter promotions and normalized hold — dynamics that mirror Missouri’s February shift. The comparison suggests Missouri could see steadier revenue even if volumes ebb after the initial novelty phase.

In Massachusetts, April’s US$676.1 million in settled wagers yielded the US$65.4 million operator win noted earlier, led by DraftKings and FanDuel. That outturn delivered tax receipts north of US$13 million for the month, a reminder that as high-hold products gain share and discounting eases, state takes can compound quickly. While Missouri’s rate, base and allowable deductions differ, the arc from lean launch months to healthier tax flows is common.

Rhode Island offers a different lens. There, online casinos complement sports betting and can smooth monthly volatility. In November 2024, iGaming revenue neared US$3 million even as sports betting swung from US$2.1 million to about US$5 million month over month on a roughly US$50.6 million handle. Missouri lacks iGaming, so sportsbook taxes will be more sensitive to seasonality and event calendars, underscoring why parlay mix and promotion discipline matter for the state budget.

Licenses, partnerships and the road ahead

Missouri’s licensing structure laid important groundwork for who competes and how revenue grows. Before go-live, regulators awarded two untethered mobile licenses to Circa Sports and DraftKings, with other operators required to pair with sports teams or casinos. That process, detailed in the commission’s awards, weighed business expertise, integrity, sustainability, advertising plans, responsible gaming and revenue potential. Soon after, FanDuel secured a partnership with Major League Soccer’s St. Louis City SC, ensuring a direct channel into one of the state’s most engaged fan bases.

Those choices have ripple effects. Untethered licenses offer operators more latitude to scale, while team and casino ties can accelerate customer acquisition through on-site activations, cross-promotion and brand equity. As these models mature, Missouri should see a clearer split between national players maximizing online penetration and regional or niche books carving out loyal segments.

The stakes for the state are straightforward: if operators keep dialing back promotions, lean into high-margin products and stabilize hold, Missouri’s monthly tax haul should trend up from the thin early returns. The February lift is an early proof point. But headwinds remain. Seasonal dips after football, the concentration of market power and the absence of iGaming could cap upside in slower months. Policymakers and regulators will watch whether marketing practices remain responsible and whether competitive dynamics deliver the consumer protections and public revenue promised during the campaign.

For now, Missouri is following a familiar trajectory: a splashy debut dominated by two national leaders, a quick reset as promotions taper and a gradual firming of the tax base. The coming quarters will show whether that base broadens — and how much of the industry’s early profits ultimately reach Jefferson City.