Kalshi joins National Council on Problem Gambling
Kalshi has become the first prediction market to join the National Council on Problem Gambling amid growing scrutiny from state regulators over its event contracts.
The company announced on Monday that it will provide US$2 million over the next two years to support a new initiative focused on “trader health and safety.”
The funding will contribute to the National Council on Problem Gambling’s research into the behavioral risks associated with prediction markets, helping to develop consumer protection measures for the sector.
“NCPG’s goal has always been to mitigate harm by increasing education, awareness, and understanding of risky behaviors, while ensuring access to trusted, scientific, and evidence-based information and healthcare resources,” said Heather L. Maurer, Executive Director of the National Council on Problem Gambling.
“Innovation and responsibility can and must evolve together. Kalshi’s engagement demonstrates a commitment to mitigating harm before it occurs and ensuring support resources are accessible when they are needed,” she added.
Kalshi has maintained that its platform operates as a financial trading marketplace rather than a traditional betting platform. However, the partnership is being viewed by some industry observers as an acknowledgment that prediction market activity can still lead to harmful financial behavior similar to traditional betting.
Regulators in several states have questioned whether sports-related event contracts offered by companies such as Kalshi should fall under gambling laws instead of federal financial regulations, with Wisconsin being the latest to sue the company over alleged illegal gambling.
Charlotte Capewell brings her passion for storytelling and expertise in writing, researching, and the gambling industry to every article she writes. Her specialties include the US gambling industry, regulator legislation, igaming, and more.
Verticals:
Sectors:
Topics:
Dig Deeper
The Backstory
Why Kalshi’s outreach lands at a sensitive moment
Kalshi’s decision to work with the National Council on Problem Gambling and fund research into trader health follows a volatile year for prediction markets, where legal definitions and social costs have been under the microscope. The company argues it operates a financial marketplace, not a sportsbook, yet regulators and advocacy groups have pressed the case that real-money wagers on events can look and feel like gambling to many users. The Wisconsin lawsuit over alleged illegal gambling underscores the stakes: if states succeed in pulling event contracts under gambling statutes, the business model and compliance burden shift dramatically. Kalshi’s partnership signals a strategic tack toward harm reduction at a time when policymakers are probing consumer risk and market design.
The National Council on Problem Gambling has been expanding its infrastructure to meet rising demand for help. The group recently launched a rebranded national helpline, 1-800-MY-RESET, positioned as an easy-to-remember, non-stigmatizing gateway to local services across 24 contact centers. The council cites research showing nearly 20 million U.S. adults reported signs of gambling-related harm in the past year. That context gives Kalshi’s funding for trader health and safety added relevance, tying a niche but fast-growing corner of finance to a broader public health response.
Regulatory whiplash from Washington to Brasília
The U.S. policy backdrop has been unsettled. Late last year, a federal district court in Washington, D.C., ruled Kalshi could list contracts tied to congressional election outcomes. In March, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission abandoned its appeal, allowing that decision to stand. The move drew sharp criticism from investor-protection advocates who view election betting as corrosive to markets and democracy. Still, with the appeal dropped, Kalshi gained near-term clarity to expand within the CFTC framework. That outcome is detailed in coverage of the regulator’s retreat in the CFTC dropping its Kalshi election betting appeal.
Abroad, the tide has run against prediction markets. Brazil imposed a sweeping block on platforms including Kalshi and Polymarket after its National Monetary Council prohibited event-linked contracts such as elections and sports. The government cast the move as part of a campaign to curb illegal betting and respond to household indebtedness. Finance officials tied the crackdown to a broader plan for stricter oversight. That escalation, outlined in Brazil’s block on Polymarket and Kalshi, shows how quickly cross-border compliance risk can crystallize when authorities treat prediction markets as gambling by another name.
The juxtaposition is stark: a green light from a U.S. court on political markets versus a red light from Brazil’s monetary authorities. For operators, that means threading a needle between commodities-style regulation and gambling law, adapting disclosures and controls to satisfy very different supervisors. For users, it raises practical questions about access, protections and recourse across jurisdictions.
A broader turn toward prevention and support
The responsible gambling infrastructure is expanding beyond traditional casinos and sportsbooks as digital wagering proliferates. The National Council on Problem Gambling’s helpline push aims to reduce barriers to care and reflect that harm can arise on many platforms, including prediction markets and fantasy sports. The group’s framing is preventive and health-first, emphasizing that help is available at any stage, not only in crisis. The launch of a new national helpline number addresses a practical challenge: making the first step memorable and simple, especially on mobile where most betting occurs.
Industry partners are aligning with that message. Lotto.com is leaning into March’s Problem Gambling Awareness Month and the theme of “seeking understanding,” highlighting tools like self-exclusion and deposit limits. The company, which secured the council’s Internet Compliance Assessment Program accreditation in 2021, framed its outreach as training and empowerment aimed at safer play. The campaign, described in Lotto.com’s partnership for Problem Gambling Awareness Month, shows how lottery and adjacent platforms are adopting practices once concentrated in higher-risk verticals.
Benchmarks are emerging for digital operators
Standards matter as regulators question where finance ends and gambling begins. The National Council on Problem Gambling’s Internet Responsible Gambling Standards provide a baseline for audits of culture, training, KYC, consumer tools and support. Daily fantasy sports operator PrizePicks became the first in its category to complete the council’s iCAP review, a signal that fantasy platforms are internalizing the need for formal, third-party validation rather than relying on ad hoc safeguards. The milestone, covered in PrizePicks receiving responsible gambling accreditation, sets a bar that other DFS and skill-based operators may be pressed to meet.
For prediction markets, similar scrutiny is likely. If traders experience losses and compulsive behavior akin to sports bettors, operators will face pressure to provide equivalent protections, even when regulated as derivatives venues. That could include clearer risk disclosures, friction in onboarding, spending and time limits, and direct routing to helpline resources. Kalshi’s funding commitment hints that the sector recognizes these expectations are coming, whether mandated or market-driven.
What the shifting ground means for markets and users
The policy split between the CFTC’s posture and state-level or international crackdowns creates a patchwork that is hard for consumers to navigate. It also invites rapid product pivots by platforms seeking compliant growth. Political-event contracts can deepen engagement for retail users and claim informational benefits, but they carry reputational and societal risks that are drawing a tougher look from lawmakers. The CFTC’s withdrawal from its appeal, as reported in the Kalshi election decision coverage, may stand as a short-term victory for market innovation yet leave open the door to future rulemaking or congressional action.
Helpline data offer a cautionary signal. The council noted that in North Carolina, sports betting calls topped lottery for the first time in 16 years, an indicator of how quickly new products can shift harm patterns. That reality supports a prevention-first stance for any platform facilitating fast, iterative wagers on uncertain outcomes. By integrating research, operator standards and accessible support, the U.S. response is moving toward a public-health model, even as other countries tighten prohibitions.
The next phase will test whether voluntary commitments like Kalshi’s can blunt regulatory backlash. Brazil’s block, outlined in the national resolution targeting prediction markets, shows how sweeping a policy reversal can be when authorities conclude that consumer harm outweighs market benefits. In the U.S., heightened cooperation with the National Council on Problem Gambling, broader adoption of iCAP-style audits and persistent visibility for 1-800-MY-RESET will be central markers of whether the industry can grow while maintaining public trust.









