First Nations chief warns online gambling will hurt native casinos

Charlotte Capewell

28 April 2026 at 7:42am UTC-4

Lake,Moraine,In,Banff,National,Park,Of,Canada,Alberta

Source: Shutterstock

Email, LinkedIn, and more

Alberta’s planned launch of legalized and regulated online gambling has raised concerns among First Nations leaders who rely on revenue from their land-based casinos.

The province’s legalized online gambling market is set to come into force on July 13, which will open the door to private operators under a framework that will bring offshore gambling activity into a controlled and regulated environment.

Article continues below ad

The state’s gambling regulator, the Alberta Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Commission, published its Standards & Requirements for Internet Gaming back in January ahead of its scheduled launch.

While the government has said the move is intended to improve consumer protection and regain lost revenue, some Indigenous leaders warn it could undermine one of the main sources of revenue for First Nations groups, according to CBC News.

Many First Nations communities depend on casino income to fund local services, employment, and development projects. A transition toward online platforms, where play is no longer tied to physical gambling locations, could reduce revenue at these venues.

Article continues below ad

Trevor Mercredi, the Grand Chief of the Treaty 8 First Nations, said, “To say that this is being looked at is something positive; it’s hard for us to see the positive in this right now.”

Laurel Wheeler, an economics professor at the University of Alberta, sides with Mercredi and notes the importance of these physical casinos.

Speaking to CBC News, she said, “When you have a positive economic shock within a community, that can lead to higher wages initially, and those higher wages can attract more people back to their home community, which can also be good for cultural preservation. All of the different markets are interconnected, and they’re all affected.”

Charlotte Capewell brings her passion for storytelling and expertise in writing, researching, and the gambling industry to every article she writes. Her specialties include the US gambling industry, regulator legislation, igaming, and more.

View Charlotte Capewell's bio and articles.

Locations:

Verticals:

Sectors:

Topics:

Dig Deeper

The Backstory

Why Alberta’s pivot hits more than policy

Alberta’s move to open a regulated online gambling market on July 13 lands at the intersection of consumer protection, tax recovery and sovereignty debates already reshaping gaming in North America. The province’s plan to license private operators and channel offshore play into a controlled environment mirrors shifts seen across the United States, where states and tribes are testing models that protect revenue without ceding ground to gray-market operators. But for First Nations leaders who fund local services with brick-and-mortar casino income, the change threatens to shift play away from venues that anchor jobs and community life. That tension is not theoretical; it has been playing out in courtrooms and capitols from Maine to Connecticut as online betting expands and adjacent markets, like prediction platforms, try to claim space once reserved for regulated gaming.

Tribal revenue under pressure from prediction markets

Native American nations in the U.S. have sharpened their legal strategy against prediction markets they say siphon money from casinos and infringe on sovereignty. In one development, a coalition backed the Ho-Chunk Nation’s bid to block contracts offered on tribal land by Kalshi and Robinhood, arguing the platforms amount to unlawful wagering that undermines tribal compacts and revenue streams. That filing, detailed in coverage of the Ho-Chunk Nation’s fight, frames prediction contracts as a direct competitor to authorized tribal gaming, not a novel financial product.

The push has extended to the Northeast, where a group led by the Indian Gaming Association and 16 federally recognized tribes argued in a court brief that companies such as Kalshi divert money away from tribal casinos. As reported in their broader challenge to prediction platforms’ growth, the tribes say sports-linked event contracts can pull play from casinos without tribal consent or oversight tied to public interest obligations. That case, connected to a Connecticut dispute, underscores how online alternatives test the boundaries of gaming law and revenue-sharing frameworks that fund essential services on tribal lands.

States draw lines as courts weigh authority

As prediction markets proliferate, state regulators have moved to set guardrails. Connecticut issued cease-and-desist orders to several operators, including Kalshi and Robinhood, over sports event contracts, escalating a question of whether federally regulated platforms can sidestep state gambling laws. The enforcement backdrop is public: the state’s Department of Consumer Protection described unlicensed online gambling actions in an order available on its website. Kalshi counters that states have overreached, setting up a jurisdictional clash now ricocheting through courts and complicating how online wagering is categorized and taxed.

The legal friction is not confined to one state. Lawmakers and regulators in Illinois, Ohio, Maryland, Montana, Arizona, Nevada, New Jersey and Massachusetts have scrutinized or acted against prediction offerings, part of the same trend outlined in reporting on tribal and state resistance to event contracts. The stakes are clear: if prediction markets capture sports-adjacent betting demand without following casino or sportsbook rules, they could drain revenues from gaming compacts and state-licensed operators while escaping responsible gambling requirements.

The tribes’ argument has also filtered into national media, which has tracked how event markets attract new money. Decrypt reported on the claims that prediction platforms “siphon” casino revenue, a piece cited in tribal filings and accessible here. The valuations attached to prediction upstarts, with funding rounds putting some firms into multibillion-dollar territory, amplify the urgency for regulators and compact holders who depend on predictable, regulated revenue streams.

Maine tests exclusivity as an alternative path

While some jurisdictions fight in court, Maine has tried to balance modernization and sovereignty by granting its tribes exclusive rights to online casino gaming. In allowing LD 1164 to take effect, Gov. Janet Mills positioned the state as the eighth in the U.S. to legalize online casino wagering, but with a model that assigns one platform per tribe, mirroring its sportsbook approach. Reporting on the change notes that the Wabanaki Nations secured exclusive igaming rights despite polling that showed public skepticism. The policy bets that exclusivity can keep revenues within tribal economies while meeting consumer demand that has already shifted online in neighboring states.

For Alberta’s First Nations weighing the province’s plan, Maine’s arrangement offers a contrasting template: rather than inviting broad private competition, reserve digital licenses for Indigenous operators to protect and grow community revenue. That approach may not be transferable across borders or legal regimes, but it illustrates the spectrum of policy options between prohibition and open-market licensing when legacy casino income is at stake.

Demand is migrating online, fast

The bettor has already moved. Sportsbooks across North America are posting record digital handles on marquee events, including hockey. The final of the 4 Nations ice hockey tournament became the most wagered-on hockey game at multiple U.S. operators, according to reports on the 4 Nations betting surge. Some books said action on the Canada–U.S. final rivaled Sunday NFL games, a reminder that even second-tier sports by handle are seeing online spikes when events capture attention.

That momentum raises practical concerns for land-based venues that rely on foot traffic. When big-game wagering, once a driver of in-person visits, shifts to phones and laptops, casinos have less leverage to cross-sell dining, entertainment and table play. For communities where casinos are economic anchors, the migration challenges a business model that funds public services with on-site spend in addition to slots and tables.

Illicit markets complicate the consumer-protection calculus

Even as regulated markets expand, unlicensed operators and criminal syndicates exploit digital channels at scale. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime estimates a US$40 billion scam industry tied to illegal gambling, fraud and money laundering, concentrated in Southeast Asia but expanding into Africa and South America. The agency’s warning, summarized in reporting on global scam hubs, underscores the enforcement challenge: crackdowns push groups to new jurisdictions and new schemes, including cyber-enabled gambling.

Authorities in the Philippines have pursued operators linked to the now-banned POGO sector, while lawmakers press for tougher measures to prevent reconstituted networks. For Alberta, that backdrop supports the rationale for regulated online channels to displace offshore sites and protect consumers. But without a revenue model that keeps First Nations whole, the consumer-protection case will collide with concerns over lost jobs and diminished local control.

The through line across these developments is not whether gambling goes online, but who governs and benefits from it. Alberta’s framework will be judged on how well it draws players from unregulated sites, enforces standards and preserves the economic role tribal casinos play in their communities. Other jurisdictions offer cautionary tales and possible blueprints. The choices now will determine whether the shift strengthens public-interest goals or erodes them as the market moves to where the bettors already are.