Colorado passes sports betting protection bill
The Colorado Senate has passed a bill aimed at increasing consumer protection in the state’s sports betting market.
Senate Bill 26-131 passed by a 20-14 vote and would bring in restrictions on licensed online sports betting operators, in order to improve oversight of the sector and tackle harmful betting practices.
Under the bill, operators would be banned from taking more than a set number of deposits from a single user in a 24-hour period. They also wouldn’t be allowed to send push notifications or SMS messages that encourage betting or deposits.
Moreover, the bill would ban operators from restricting users’ betting activity just because they are successful, unless there are concerns about customer behavior.
Advertising rules would also be tightened. The bill would ban sports betting ads between 8am and 10pm and during live sporting events. Promotions featuring enhanced payouts or instructions on how to place bets would also be banned.
In addition, the bill would ban the use of credit cards for funding betting accounts and establish reporting requirements for operators, including the submission of annual data to regulators.
That data would be included in a public report on the industry every three years, though this will not start until 2029.
The bill will now go to the House for further debate. An earlier proposal to ban prop bets was dropped after concerns of potential revenue losses.
Verticals:
Sectors:
Topics:
Dig Deeper
Related stories
The Backstory
How Colorado arrived at a clampdown moment
Colorado’s push to tighten sports betting rules has been building for months as lawmakers weighed rising participation against mounting concerns over addiction, aggressive marketing and the use of credit. The latest Senate vote follows a narrow committee test that previewed the contours of the debate: protections without dismantling the legal market voters approved in 2019. In late winter, a Senate panel advanced a bipartisan package that sought to curb daily deposits, mute push alerts and police language in ads, while floating a ban on player proposition wagers. That early version passed the Senate Finance Committee by a 5-4 margin after heated testimony about the trade-offs between consumer safeguards and channeling bettors to regulated books. The contours of that hearing are detailed in Colorado Senate committee votes for new gambling guardrails, which captured both the scope of proposed restrictions and industry warnings about migration to offshore sites.
The Senate’s subsequent floor action charts how those ideas hardened or fell away. Lawmakers kept tight limits on how and how often bettors can fund accounts, reined in push notifications and texts, and advanced ad restrictions with set hours and event-based constraints. But an outright ban on prop bets was dropped amid revenue concerns, underscoring the tension between behavioral risk and the state’s appetite to preserve popular bet types that drive engagement. The passage sets the stage for a House debate focused on how to calibrate enforcement and whether to adjust timelines for reporting and public disclosures that would begin later in the decade.
From committee draft to floor vote: what changed and why
The Finance Committee version would have limited customers to five deposits per day and outright banned proposition bets tied to in-game events or individual performances. That package was pitched as “common-sense guardrails” to reduce problem gambling triggers while maintaining a viable legal option for adults, as chronicled in the committee’s narrow approval. Industry representatives countered that an aggressive crackdown could depress state revenue and push some bettors to unregulated markets with fewer protections.
As the bill moved to the floor, amendments reflected those fiscal and competitive realities. Lawmakers preserved tighter controls on marketing and funding — including a ban on using credit cards to load accounts and restrictions on push messaging — that aim to reduce impulsive play. But they dropped the prop-bet prohibition, a recognition that such wagers account for significant handle and drive customer acquisition. The political math was also influenced by warnings that a partial ban would be hard to enforce consistently across leagues and events, risking confusion for consumers and compliance burdens for operators.
Another key feature that survived is enhanced reporting. Operators would be required to submit annual data to regulators that feeds into a public report on the industry every three years beginning in 2029. That cadence signals a longer-term regulatory posture: lawmakers want a richer dataset on betting behavior and operator conduct to inform future guardrails rather than a one-and-done legislative fix.
Tax policy under the microscope: “free bets” and water funding
Colorado’s scrutiny has not been limited to player protections and marketing. Fiscal policy tied to sports betting is evolving in parallel, with lawmakers targeting promotional write-offs that lower taxable revenue. A separate proposal, Colorado lawmakers discuss taxing free sports bets, would scale back the deductibility of free bets and bonuses that operators use to attract and retain customers. Sponsors argue the change could deliver roughly $12 million more annually to the state’s water projects, a key priority given chronic drought, climate pressure and population growth.
The tax debate mirrors a broader trend as states reassess how to balance market growth with public revenue. Ohio, Illinois and Massachusetts have already raised their tax rates, with Illinois jumping to 40 percent. Colorado’s current 10 percent tax remains comparatively low. Narrowing promotional deductions would be a more targeted lever than an across-the-board rate hike, but it could still alter how sportsbooks spend on customer acquisition and retention. If paired with stricter ad limits and deposit rules, the combined effect may compress operator margins and slow promotional intensity, especially for new entrants competing against national brands.
A market in expansion meets tighter guardrails
The state’s appetite for new content and suppliers is rising even as lawmakers tighten the reins. Colorado regulators recently cleared a global betting data and content firm to bring esports and niche competitions into the market, broadening the product mix. As covered in Beter approved as vendor in Colorado, the company secured a Vendor Minor License to supply ESportsBattle tournaments and Setka Cup table tennis events through a partnership with Bet365. It is the first time U.S. bettors can access ESportsBattle content, adding thousands of additional live events with real-time data and odds.
That expansion underscores a central tension in Colorado’s debate. A richer menu of markets, including esports and lower-tier competitions, can drive engagement but also heighten the need for controls around notifications, ad targeting and deposit frequency. Limits on credit card funding and push alerts could blunt the more impulsive edges of always-on, micro-event wagering. At the same time, policymakers appear wary of stifling a regulated ecosystem that is attracting global suppliers. The legislative path suggests a middle course: allow product innovation and new verticals while curbing the most aggressive marketing and payment practices.
Regional and global context: a shift toward firmer oversight
Colorado’s recalibration fits a larger pattern across jurisdictions refining early sports betting frameworks. In the South, Mississippi is moving to modernize a legacy model that restricts mobile wagering, with the House approving a bill to legalize online betting tethered to brick-and-mortar casinos. Supporters argue it will protect casino partners and siphon play from offshore markets, with a 12 percent tax channeling funds to infrastructure. See the details in Mississippi House passes online sports betting bill.
Abroad, New Zealand is finalizing a comprehensive online casino regime that centralizes oversight with the Department of Internal Affairs, caps licenses at up to 15 and arms regulators with stronger enforcement tools, including fines up to NZ$5 million. That framework, outlined in New Zealand’s online casino bill passes parliamentary scrutiny, also mandates consumer protections and directs a slice of tax revenue to sports and social causes. The common thread with Colorado is not prohibition but supervision: calibrated rules on promotions, payments and advertising, paired with clearer accountability and more robust data.
The stakes for Colorado’s next steps
As the bill heads to the House, the state is weighing how to synchronize its consumer protections with tax policy and market growth. Deposit limits, advertising curbs and bans on credit card funding could reduce problem gambling risks and blunt the industry’s most aggressive tactics. Tighter rules on promotions via tax changes would raise public revenue while pressuring books to be more judicious with giveaways. At the same time, new vendors and content verticals are entering the market, promising more events, more liquidity and more reasons for bettors to log on.
The outcome will shape how operators market, price and manage risk in one of the country’s more competitive betting states. It will also test whether incremental guardrails — rather than sweeping prohibitions — can keep the legal market attractive enough to curb offshore play. With a public reporting regime slated to mature later in the decade, the state is betting that more transparency will inform the next round of policy. For now, Colorado is trying to thread the needle: preserve a legal market that works, but make it less likely to work against consumers.
