PayNearMe announces launch of Cash App Pay for real-money gaming
Last week at SBC Summit Americas, PayNearMe announced the launch of Cash App Pay for use in real-money gaming.
It’s not an ordinary announcement, not when 59 million people, many of them Gen Z – born from 1997 to 2012 – use Cash App instead of traditional banks.
“It is a very large account for stored value,” PayNearMe Vice President, Gaming & Sports Betting Leighton Webb said during the summit. “People use Cash App for everything, from paying for items to taxes. … People are using Cash App basically as their bank.”
Whereas an app such as Venmo is transactional – people use it to send money to a friend, for instance – Cash App has replaced banks for its users.
“Effectively they’re using it for their financial life,” Webb said. “What’s unique about Cash App is that if you think of it as an ecosystem, it is bringing that ecosystem to the gaming audience. Fifty-nine million people, billions and billions of dollars of transactions, through that Cash App ecosystem.”
With close to 60 millions users, that’s about one of every seven people in the United States using Cash App. Webb says that compared to PayPal, which skews to an older user, Cash App’s users tend to be younger.
“A big segment of that audience is a younger demographic, but again, what’s unique is right now those users, they’re playing on gaming apps but they don’t have a way to use their primary payment method,” Webb says. “Our research consistently shows that payment choice directly impacts player engagement. When players can use their preferred payment method, they’re more likely to complete transactions and remain active. Convenience matters — just as consumers often favor merchants that accept Apple Pay, players are drawn to gaming platforms that support the payment experiences they prefer.”
Online players in Arkansas can pay for gaming with Cash App. BetSaracen is the first operator worldwide to go live, with additional operators expected to launch in the second half of 2026. BetSaracen, the sports wagering arm of Saracen Casino Resort, is one of America’s top-performing single-state operators.
“Our players expect payment options that are fast, simple and aligned with how they manage their money,” said Saracen Casino Resort General Manager Matt Harkness. “Payments are everything, and adding Cash App Pay gives us a seamless way to meet those expectations while expanding the payment choices available in our app.”
Webb says Cash App users can use it to pay for igaming play. They also have a debit card that can be used to withdraw money in brick-and-mortar from ATMs. But so far, there are no plans to make Cash App available for cashless payments at casinos.
“I think people in general, they’re not looking to add new payment types,” Webb says. “You probably use one or two credit cards and your debit card. It’s very difficult to get someone to sign up with a brand new payment type, a new way of doing things. Versus with Cash App — we’re getting them to use something they’re already using, and they prefer to use.”
“That tender is available to them, and they’re going to be more inclined to use it because they’re already using it regularly,” Webb says. “It’s not a new tender that’s being introduced. We’re not trying to get people to sign up and have them do things in a different way. That’s the key thing. I think where companies struggle is when they try to introduce a new tender and say, ‘hey, here’s this new thing, we want you to do things in a new way.’ That’s very difficult to do.”
Verticals:
Sectors:
Topics:
Dig Deeper
Related stories
2025/08/29: PayNearMe attacks failed payments with Payment Experience Management
2025/05/22: PayNearMe targets payment friction to boost igaming margins
2026/01/12: Incentive Games partners with Bet365 for global launch of real-money game titles
2026/04/24: India to enforce ban on real-money online gaming
2025/08/29: PayNearMe attacks failed payments with Payment Experience Management
2025/05/22: PayNearMe targets payment friction to boost igaming margins
2026/01/12: Incentive Games partners with Bet365 for global launch of real-money game titles
2026/04/24: India to enforce ban on real-money online gaming
The Backstory
Payments move closer to the center of online gambling
PayNearMe’s launch of Cash App Pay for real-money gaming reflects a broader shift in which payments are no longer a back-office function for betting operators. They have become a competitive tool, a retention lever and, increasingly, a regulatory pressure point.
The Arkansas rollout with BetSaracen gives Cash App users a way to fund online wagering through a payment method many already use as a primary financial account. That matters because gaming operators compete not only on odds, content and promotions but also on whether players can move money quickly and with minimal friction. For younger consumers, particularly those who use digital wallets instead of traditional bank accounts, the ability to use a familiar account can affect whether a registration becomes a deposit and whether a bettor remains active.
The announcement also comes as real-money gaming expands unevenly across markets. In the U.S., regulated operators are seeking product and payments improvements within state-by-state licensing systems. Abroad, some governments are tightening controls or banning paid play altogether. That contrast frames the stakes for payment companies such as PayNearMe: growth depends on serving licensed operators in markets where regulators allow real-money play, while avoiding exposure to jurisdictions where the legal basis for the business is under challenge.
Operators chase smoother deposits as content globalizes
The payments push is happening alongside a parallel effort by suppliers and operators to broaden real-money gaming content. Online casino developers are seeking distribution through major brands, while operators look for games that can work across multiple regulated jurisdictions.
That dynamic was evident when Incentive Games partnered with Bet365 for a global real-money games launch. The deal covered worldwide deployment, including in U.S. states, and followed approvals for Incentive Games in Michigan, Ontario and the United Kingdom. The companies had already worked together in Brazil on Velocity, a crash-style game, before expanding the relationship into a broader real-money agreement.
Such supplier deals underline why payments have become more strategically important. A global operator may be able to offer similar game portfolios across markets, but the customer experience can still vary sharply by jurisdiction, payment preference and banking access. A game that draws users into an app still depends on the operator’s ability to convert interest into funded play. If deposits fail, take too long or require an unfamiliar method, the content investment loses value.
PayNearMe’s Cash App Pay launch fits that commercial logic. Rather than asking customers to adopt a new payment product, the company is adding a familiar tender to the gaming checkout. That approach reflects a lesson from digital commerce: consumers often gravitate toward merchants that accept the payment tools already embedded in their daily lives. In gambling, where funding an account is a regulated and closely monitored action, reducing friction without weakening compliance is a material advantage.
India shows how quickly revenue can disappear
The opportunity in regulated U.S. markets contrasts sharply with developments in India, where real-money online gaming operators have faced a sweeping policy reversal. The passage of the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill upended a large fantasy sports and online gaming market by banning real-money play while allowing social gaming and subscription models to continue.
The impact was immediate for companies built around paid contests. Dream11 warned that its revenue fell 95% overnight after the legislation passed, according to comments by Chief Executive Harsh Jain reported by Moneycontrol. The company also told the Board of Control for Cricket in India it could no longer continue as title sponsor of the national cricket team, walking away from a sponsorship contract valued at $44 million covering 2023 to 2026.
Dream11’s warning highlighted how dependent some operators were on real-money fantasy sports and how difficult it is to replace that revenue with noncash gaming products. Sponsorships, team partnerships and advertising tied to the popularity of fantasy contests became vulnerable once the core revenue model was barred. The company said it did not plan layoffs, but the loss of nearly all revenue and all profits showed how fast regulatory risk can overwhelm scale.
For payment providers, India’s experience is a cautionary example. When a jurisdiction reclassifies or prohibits real-money play, payment rails connected to those products can become unusable almost immediately. The commercial value of a wallet integration depends on the durability of the legal framework supporting the underlying gaming activity.
Legal uncertainty complicates the Indian market
India’s ban has not ended the legal disputes over how online games should be classified, taxed and regulated. Operators have continued to challenge aspects of enforcement, especially where skill-based games and fantasy sports are concerned.
In one sign of continuing uncertainty, India’s Supreme Court directed authorities not to take coercive action against Fanmade11 Fantasy Sports and 9Stacks Games until it rules in a separate Gameskraft case. The matter is tied to the legal and tax treatment of real-money online gaming and fantasy sports following introduction of the 2025 law. The court’s eventual decision is expected to clarify whether certain games can still claim different treatment based on skill and how goods and services tax demands apply.
The Supreme Court action did not reopen the market for operators, but it underscored that the legal architecture remains contested. Tax treatment, game classification and enforcement powers are all central to whether online gaming can operate at scale. Even temporary relief from enforcement can matter for companies facing penalties or demands, but the broader business model remains constrained until courts and regulators settle the rules.
The government has also moved to make the ban operational. India is set to enforce the real-money online gaming ban from May 1, with the Online Gaming Authority of India overseeing classification and compliance. The law defines real-money gaming broadly, covering games in which users pay fees, deposit money or stake assets for potential financial gain, regardless of whether outcomes involve skill, chance or both. Violations, including advertising banned services, can carry fines of INR 1 crore and prison terms of up to three years.
That breadth is important. It limits the room for operators to argue that a payment-based product is permissible because skill is involved. It also signals that payment flows, marketing and platform access may all fall within enforcement priorities.
U.S. regulators face a different threat
In the U.S., the regulatory debate is less about a national ban and more about protecting licensed markets from operators or products that sit outside state gambling frameworks. Tribal and commercial gaming interests have increasingly focused on offshore betting, sweepstakes casinos, prediction markets and crypto-linked products that may compete with regulated gambling without the same licensing obligations.
At the Indian Gaming Association Tradeshow and Convention, industry figures warned that illegal or quasi-legal competitors could erode the regulated model. Tribal and commercial gaming operators were urged to pay closer attention to illegal operators, including offshore sites and prediction markets. The American Gaming Association estimated offshore operators generated $402 billion in handle and $17.3 billion in revenue in 2024.
The concerns extend to prediction markets regulated through the Commodity Futures Trading Commission rather than state gambling agencies. Speakers at the conference warned that if such products can offer sports-related contracts while asserting that state gambling law does not apply, they could bypass licensing, responsible gambling rules and tribal compacts. Lawsuits involving Nevada, New Jersey and Iowa regulators showed how the issue is moving from policy debate to litigation.
For payment companies and licensed operators, the distinction between regulated and unregulated channels is central. Legal operators must meet know-your-customer, anti-money laundering and responsible gambling requirements. Payment providers serving those operators are part of that compliance ecosystem. If unlicensed competitors accept easier payments or operate without equivalent controls, they can pull customers away while increasing pressure on regulators to act.
The stakes behind a checkout option
Cash App Pay’s move into real-money gaming is therefore more than a new deposit button. It shows how mature U.S. operators are trying to make regulated gambling easier to access for customers who already live in digital wallets, while staying inside state-approved systems.
The commercial case is clear: more payment choice can improve conversion, engagement and retention. The regulatory context is more complex. Markets such as India show how quickly governments can restrict real-money gaming when political and social concerns rise. U.S. debates over sweepstakes, prediction markets and offshore operators show that even where gambling is legal, the boundaries of legality remain contested.
PayNearMe’s launch positions payments as part of the next phase of competition in real-money gaming. Operators that can combine appealing content, trusted brands and familiar payment methods may gain an edge. But the durability of that edge will depend on the same factor shaping the industry globally: whether regulators continue to view the product, the operator and the payment flow as part of a lawful market.
