OpenBet clocks US$3 billion in bets wagered across the World Cup

Dig Deeper

The Backstory

World Cup became a stress test for sportsbook technology

OpenBet’s World Cup figures sit within a broader shift in sports betting: major tournaments are no longer judged only by handle, but by whether suppliers can support high-volume, personalized and live betting without disruption. The company said it processed more than 175 million bets and $3 billion in stakes across its global customer base during the tournament, making the event its largest betting test to date.

That scale matters because soccer has become a proving ground for products that are more complex than a straight match-winner bet. Operators increasingly depend on same-game combinations, player props, in-play markets and geolocation systems to capture demand while maintaining compliance. For suppliers, the commercial upside is tied to reliability. A World Cup delivers sustained load across weeks, not just a short burst around one championship game.

The tournament also arrived as operators were managing pressure from taxation, compliance requirements, illegal offshore competition and new entrants from prediction markets. Those forces have made technology performance more central to sportsbook economics. A platform that can support more bet types, more location checks and more live wagering can help operators defend margins at a time when regulatory and competitive costs are rising.

Bet builders moved from feature to core product

The OpenBet data reflected a market-wide increase in demand for curated, personalized bets. The company said BetBuilder activity rose sharply from the previous World Cup final, while player prop betting more than doubled from Qatar in 2022. The growth was not isolated. Rival supplier Kambi reported similar momentum during the group stage, when its live Bet Builder product accounted for about 20% of all live bets, up from 3% during the full 2022 tournament.

That earlier Kambi World Cup group-stage data pointed to the same behavioral shift OpenBet later described: bettors are increasingly building wagers around individual players, match events and live conditions instead of simply backing a team result. Kambi said player props were a core part of its soccer offering, with some stars accounting for large shares of player-related turnover.

The causality is straightforward. Better data feeds, faster pricing and more flexible user interfaces have made it easier for sportsbooks to offer granular markets. In turn, bettors have become accustomed to the depth available in major U.S. sports and now expect a similar experience in global soccer. Once that expectation is established, suppliers face pressure to provide combinations that can be priced accurately and settled quickly during periods of heavy traffic.

For operators, the appeal is commercial as well as experiential. Bet builders and player props typically carry stronger margins than standard pre-match markets. They also keep customers engaged deeper into games and across an entire tournament. OpenBet’s ability to process high volumes without an outage therefore supports a larger strategic objective: helping operators expand product mix while preserving customer trust during peak demand.

Prediction markets added competitive pressure

The World Cup also unfolded amid the rapid expansion of sports-linked prediction markets in the United States. A report based on H2 Gambling Capital data estimated that prediction markets accounted for 27% of U.S. sports bets during the tournament, up from 9% at the start of 2026. The estimate was imperfect because sportsbooks and prediction markets measure activity differently, but the direction of travel was clear.

That surge in World Cup prediction-market activity raised the stakes for sportsbook operators and their suppliers. Prediction markets can operate under federal rules, giving them potential access to states where sports betting remains unavailable and to customers who are younger than the typical sportsbook age threshold. During the tournament, they increased advertising and expanded sports-related contracts, placing more pressure on traditional books to match speed, simplicity and breadth of offering.

OpenBet’s performance should be read against that backdrop. A supplier processing hundreds of millions of interactions, including location checks, is not only handling volume. It is helping regulated sportsbooks differentiate themselves from adjacent products by offering richer betting experiences within established compliance frameworks. If prediction markets continue to pull customers toward event contracts, sportsbooks will need to respond with more intuitive products and sharper in-play depth.

Some operators are already moving in that direction. Fanatics, for example, recently entered prediction markets while also investing in sportsbook compliance and protection technology. That dual strategy underscores a broader industry response: companies are trying to compete in emerging formats without weakening the controls that underpin regulated sports betting.

Compliance demands rose with scale

OpenBet’s tournament figures included more than 200 million location checks through its OpenBet Locator product across regulated U.S. states. That detail is important because geolocation has become one of the quiet infrastructure requirements behind U.S. sports betting. Every high-profile event increases the burden on systems that must verify whether a customer is legally permitted to place a wager.

The company has been positioning compliance tools as part of the same technology stack that supports betting growth. In a recent U.S. rollout, Fanatics launched OpenBet compliance and player-protection systems across 23 sports-betting markets. The deployment included OpenBet Locator for geolocation and Neccton for responsible gaming and anti-money laundering monitoring.

That partnership illustrated how operators are treating compliance as a competitive necessity rather than a back-office function. Real-time location verification, fraud detection and machine-learning systems for identifying risky behavior are becoming essential as sportsbooks scale across states. They also help operators demonstrate to regulators that product expansion is matched by safeguards.

The World Cup magnified those requirements. In-play betting and player props can increase engagement, but they also generate more transactions and more behavioral data. The more frequently customers interact with a product, the more important it becomes to detect unusual patterns, enforce state boundaries and document compliance. OpenBet’s ability to tie high-volume betting to high-volume location checks is central to the way regulated operators seek to grow without inviting additional regulatory scrutiny.

Taxes and fees changed operator incentives

The broader U.S. market has become more complicated for sportsbooks because some states are raising the cost of each transaction. Illinois provided one of the clearest examples. After the state introduced a per-wager tax in July, the number of sports bets placed in September fell by about 5 million from the same month a year earlier, even as total handle climbed to a record $1.4 billion.

The Illinois sports-betting tax data showed how policy can alter betting behavior. The average bet rose 28% to $46.44, suggesting that fees and minimums may discourage smaller wagers while preserving or even increasing total dollars staked. The state’s first-of-its-kind per-wager tax charges operators 25 cents per bet for the first 20 million wagers each year and 50 cents per bet after that threshold.

For suppliers such as OpenBet, the lesson is that product mix and margin matter more when transaction costs rise. If operators face taxes tied to bet count, they may favor higher-value wagers, higher-margin products and experiences that justify larger stakes. Bet builders and player props can fit that strategy, particularly when they increase average engagement without relying only on low-value, high-frequency bets.

The Illinois experience also shows why platform efficiency is tied to public policy. Operators must absorb or pass along new costs while competing against offshore sportsbooks and prediction markets that may not face the same tax structure. Technology that helps improve margins, reduce friction and maintain compliance becomes more valuable in that environment.

Illegal gambling remains the unresolved backdrop

The growth of regulated betting and adjacent prediction markets has not eliminated illegal gambling. In the U.S., 50 state attorneys general urged federal action against offshore operators in August, reflecting concern that unlicensed platforms continue to draw customers away from regulated markets. Abroad, enforcement actions show the same problem at scale.

South Korea recently reported more than 5,000 arrests in a yearlong illegal online gambling crackdown, with authorities also identifying thousands of minors who participated in illicit gambling. The South Korean enforcement operation highlighted how illegal betting networks can become organized, cross-border businesses that target younger users and evade domestic controls.

That enforcement context matters for OpenBet’s World Cup milestone. High betting volume is valuable only if it is captured within regulated systems that can verify location, monitor behavior and apply responsible gaming rules. The stakes for suppliers and operators are therefore broader than one tournament’s handle. Their challenge is to meet consumer demand for faster and more personalized betting while giving regulators reasons to keep expanding legal markets.

The World Cup showed that demand is growing and changing quickly. OpenBet’s record processing figures, Kambi’s bet-builder data, the rise of prediction markets, Illinois’ tax experiment and global illegal-gambling crackdowns all point to the same conclusion: the next phase of sports betting will be shaped as much by infrastructure and regulation as by the sporting calendar.