DraftKings intends to go full bore into prediction markets
DraftKings is going all-in on prediction markets
During Friday’s earning call, CEO Jason Robins said the company intends to commit vast resources to the new opportunity to generate revenue.
“Predictions is rapidly developing into a massive incremental opportunity, and we are moving with urgency,” Robins said Friday during DraftKings fourth-quarter earnings call. “We expect to emerge as the leader in the category. We plan to deploy growth capital to build the best customer experience and predictions and acquire millions of customers.”
DraftKings reported revenue of US$2 billion in the fourth quarter, an increase of US$596 million, or 43%, compared to US$1.4 billion during the same period in 2024. The increase was driven primarily by steady customer engagement, efficient acquisition of new customers, and higher sportsbook net revenue margin.
Robins noted that DraftKings has been taking advantage of growth opportunities since its launch more than 14 years ago. The emergence of prediction markets provides “the most exciting new growth opportunity we’ve seen since PASPA (the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act) was struck down in 2018,” Robins said.
The decision to pursue predictions more intently was driven by the Commodities Futures Trading Commission’s signaling that it will defend it in the courts and will issue guidelines and regulations.
“Anything that creates a stable regulatory environment that allows us to operate more freely is a great upside thing for us,” Robins said. “And then you combine that with what we’re seeing in our early numbers and what we’re seeing in the broader numbers from some of the others in the market, and it’s clear that there’s a lot of growth potential here.
“I’ve seen analysts estimates as high as US$16 billion. We centered around US$10 (billion), which is kind of the average of the bunch, and some back-envelope math we were doing as well. But it’s clearly a huge opportunity.”
Robins noted that DraftKings has the necessary tools to be a success in predictions markets. Pricing models and marketing mechanisms are in place.
“We’ll probably spend some incremental marketing, but we can repurpose a lot of our marketing,” Robins said. “We have a ton of national spend targeting the sports customer already, so there’s a ton of synergy there. I think it’s a huge advantage for us that we can do that.”
Robins doesn’t foresee cannibalization of existing online sports betting customers. The biggest opportunities will come from states including California and Texas, where online sports betting is illegal and where growth opportunities abound.
“Just to sort of paint the picture of why we’re excited, it would be like if you told me we opened up the rest of the US overnight to some lesser version, but still very strong version of sports product that could really monetize the customers and engage the customers in ways that we never were able to with fantasy sports,” Robins said.
DraftKings acquired Railbird, a CFTC-registered prediction market, in October. Along with other resources, Robins views DraftKings as having a competitive advantage.
“Because we have the pricing models, because we have the trading desk, we have all the things that you need already, we should be able to really quickly become one of the largest, if not the largest, market makers out there,” Robins said. “I think that gives us a huge advantage in terms of supply and liquidity.”
Verticals:
Sectors:
Topics:
Dig Deeper
Related stories
2025/08/07: As second quarter yields record revenue, DraftKings Chief Executive Jason Robins pledges to monitor prediction markets
2025/11/07: DraftKings earnings call focuses on prediction markets and how new partnership with ESPN can be leveraged
2025/11/07: DraftKings’ Jason Robins suggests prediction markets could drive igaming regulation
2025/11/25: What does the future hold for prediction markets after big players break from AGA?
2025/08/07: As second quarter yields record revenue, DraftKings Chief Executive Jason Robins pledges to monitor prediction markets
2025/11/07: DraftKings earnings call focuses on prediction markets and how new partnership with ESPN can be leveraged
2025/11/07: DraftKings’ Jason Robins suggests prediction markets could drive igaming regulation
2025/11/25: What does the future hold for prediction markets after big players break from AGA?
The Backstory
Why DraftKings is stepping on the gas
DraftKings’ decision to pour resources into prediction markets follows months of internal debate and external signals that the category is moving from fringe to formal. The company framed “predictions” as a new, federally governed lane adjacent to sports betting, one it can enter quickly by leaning on existing trading, pricing and marketing infrastructure. The rationale is straightforward: prediction markets offer access to consumers in states that block online sportsbooks, with a path to scale that DraftKings believes rivals its post-PASPA surge.
That shift did not happen overnight. Over the past year, DraftKings executives toggled between cautious monitoring and active buildout as they tracked legal and commercial developments around event contracts. Early this year they signaled a faster timeline after regulators telegraphed a willingness to defend the framework in court and set clearer rules. DraftKings now says the prize is large enough to merit growth capital and prominent product placement.
From caution to commitment
In the summer, Chief Executive Jason Robins told investors the company would “keep a close eye” on prediction markets, stressing there was no need to be first and that relationships with state regulators and tribes would shape any move. He laid out that stance during a quarterly call, citing tradeoffs around stock, cash flow and regulatory complexity as reasons to stay in “monitor mode” while watching early movers. That measured posture is detailed in DraftKings’ second-quarter remarks on monitoring prediction markets, where record revenue gave the company room to study, not sprint.
By the fall, the tone changed. In its third-quarter communication, DraftKings described “DraftKings Predictions” as a “significant incremental opportunity” that could be launched in coming months, starting in states where the sportsbook is unavailable. Robins also floated a broader policy effect, arguing that mainstream adoption of predictions could spur more states to legalize online sports betting and igaming. That argument is laid out in DraftKings’ view that prediction markets could drive igaming regulation.
Soon after, DraftKings used its earnings platform to emphasize predictions even over a splashy media deal. Analysts focused on how the new product might be distributed and funded, and Robins stressed the ability to reuse national marketing and tap existing media assets to limit incremental spend. He also pointed to the company’s acquisition of a CFTC-registered exchange as a regulatory and liquidity edge. The pivot is documented in DraftKings’ earnings call focused on predictions and the ESPN tie-up.
A federal opening, state friction
DraftKings’ push rests on a federal framework that treats event contracts as commodities overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. That structure offers a single national gatekeeper rather than a patchwork of state-by-state sportsbook rules. The company has argued that clearer CFTC guidance, along with stated willingness to defend the regime in court, reduces regulatory risk to a tolerable level for investment.
At the same time, state dynamics still matter. In jurisdictions that already allow legal online sports betting, DraftKings expects less headroom for sports-based predictions. In others, especially large states without sportsbooks, predictions could serve as an on-ramp for customer acquisition and long-term monetization. Robins has said the company briefed state policymakers after buying a regulated exchange and expects to be selective about where it launches to avoid conflicts with existing agreements and sensitivities. That calculus is spelled out in the company’s post-earnings commentary on state engagement.
The financial context also matters. DraftKings has grappled with rising taxes in certain states and volatility from “customer friendly” outcomes that can swing sportsbook revenue. Management has pointed to contract optimizations, payment cost controls and automation as levers to protect margins while funding expansion. A federally regulated predictions business, with different economics and reach, could diversify those exposures, as discussed in the second-quarter call.
Media muscle as a distribution moat
DraftKings’ media relationships are central to its predictions strategy. The company highlighted the ability to amplify new products across partner platforms while cross-selling to an existing sports audience at lower incremental cost. Robins said the ESPN pact can do more than advertise, pointing to integration potential that could increase engagement and retention inside the app ecosystem. That playbook is described in the earnings call where the ESPN partnership was unpacked.
Distribution advantages also intersect with liquidity. Prediction markets depend on depth and pricing efficiency. DraftKings argues its trading desk, pricing models and scale audience give it a head start to seed markets, reduce spreads and draw activity. That same combination helped the company navigate waves of new competitors in online sports betting; management contends the incumbency benefits are stronger now.
Scrutiny intensifies around betting and integrity
The broader regulatory backdrop includes mounting scrutiny of gambling integrity, particularly where sports intersects with wagering. The National Basketball Players Association recently said an arbitrator ruled that Miami Heat guard Terry Rozier is owed his full $26.6 million salary despite federal gambling-related charges. The league had withheld pay during legal proceedings, but the union argued the criteria were not met. The case, summarized in coverage of the Rozier arbitration decision, underscores how player conduct investigations can collide with contractual rights and due process.
For operators, these cases raise reputational and regulatory stakes. Even when federal oversight sits with the CFTC, public and political perceptions of gambling risk bleed across categories. DraftKings has emphasized compliance, relationship management with state regulators and conservative launch plans as buffers. The company’s argument is that a federally supervised predictions product, with clear rules and guardrails, can coexist with integrity protections and may ultimately normalize broader online wagering.
Signals from the wider gaming economy
The predictions bet is unfolding as gaming suppliers report steady growth, suggesting resilient consumer demand for wagering-adjacent entertainment. Light & Wonder posted record full-year revenue, with double-digit gains in gaming and improving profitability metrics, as noted in the company’s latest results. While not a direct proxy for prediction markets, the performance signals that content, distribution and data-driven monetization remain durable across gaming verticals.
DraftKings is applying a similar thesis: pair a large audience with a new, regulated product, keep acquisition costs in check through media leverage, and use technology and liquidity to differentiate. Earlier in the year, the company framed predictions as “monitor and learn.” It has since moved to “build and lead,” betting that a federally anchored model can expand its total addressable market, smooth revenue volatility and widen its moat before rivals catch up. The path will still run through regulators, media partners and risk management. But for DraftKings, the backstory explains why the company now sees predictions less as an experiment and more as its next engine of growth.
