Member of Chen Zhi-linked illegal gambling network extradited from Cambodia to China

18 June 2026 at 7:12am UTC-4
Email, LinkedIn, and more

Police in China have confirmed the extradition of a key figure in a criminal network allegedly devised by businessman Chen Zhi.

Liu Ren’s extradition from Cambodia to China is part of an ongoing criminal investigation linked to transnational fraud and illegal online gambling operations.

Article continues below ad
G2E web email

Chen was previously arrested in Cambodia. According to a statement from the criminal investigation department of the Chinese Ministry of Public Security, he was extradited to China in January.

He now faces accusations from Chinese and US authorities related to cross-border fraud, illegal business operations, and other crimes.

Authorities said Chen instructed Liu to establish Jinbei Group, which is reported to have run several online gambling platforms that targeted Chinese residents.

Article continues below ad
Medianug web

From 2020, Jinbei Group is also said to have expanded into managing telecoms fraud compounds in Cambodia. Investigators claim that these operations were involved in large-scale online and telecommunications-related fraud schemes that involved “extremely large amounts” of money.

Police in China added that Liu is being charged with intentional injury and suspected illegal detention. The case is ongoing according to authorities.

CiG Insignia
Locations:
Verticals:
Sectors:
Topics:

Dig Deeper

The Backstory

Beijing pushes cases beyond Cambodia

The extradition of Liu Ren from Cambodia to China marks another step in Beijing’s widening campaign against offshore gambling and fraud networks that Chinese authorities say were built to reach mainland customers from jurisdictions across Southeast Asia. The case is tied to businessman Chen Zhi, whose alleged network has become a focal point for China’s cross-border enforcement drive.

Chinese police say Liu helped establish Jinbei Group at Chen’s direction and that the group operated online gambling platforms aimed at Chinese residents before expanding into telecoms fraud compounds in Cambodia. The allegations put Liu’s case inside a broader pattern: gambling websites, messaging-based recruitment, crypto-enabled money movement and compounds that authorities increasingly describe as part gambling operation, part fraud infrastructure.

Chen’s own detention has sharpened that focus. In a related case, Chen Zhi was detained in China over online gambling and fraud allegations after Chinese authorities cited cooperation with Cambodia. U.S. prosecutors separately alleged that Chen oversaw platforms and scams from Cambodia’s coast and claimed the operations generated vast daily revenue. Chen has denied wrongdoing.

Cambodia’s role shifted after the 2019 ban

Cambodia was once a major base for online gambling operators targeting Chinese customers. That model came under pressure after then-Prime Minister Hun Sen moved in August 2019 to halt online gambling licenses before making the ban permanent. The prohibition did not end the business. Instead, law enforcement accounts across the region suggest parts of the industry moved underground, merged with scam operations or migrated to neighboring jurisdictions while retaining Cambodian links.

That transition is central to the stakes in the Liu and Chen cases. Chinese authorities have long treated offshore gambling as a capital flight, social stability and organized crime issue. Under Chinese law, citizens are barred from operating overseas gambling businesses that target Chinese nationals, and recent changes have expanded criminal liability for gambling on overseas sites. For Beijing, Cambodia’s cooperation is therefore not only bilateral policing but a test of whether former offshore hubs can be turned into enforcement partners.

Recent Cambodian raids show the persistence of illegal operations despite the ban. In one case, Cambodian police raided an illegal igaming operation in Phnom Penh and found about 170 foreign nationals from China, Vietnam and Myanmar. Authorities said the site involved online gambling and may also have included trafficking, kidnapping and drug use. The details mirror concerns raised in other cases: foreign workers held in guarded premises, gambling technology used alongside fraud scripts and immigration violations complicating criminal investigations.

Regional networks rely on servers, phones and crypto

The operational model described in the Liu case is not isolated. Across Asia, investigators have identified networks that split functions across countries: servers in one jurisdiction, marketers in another, payment handlers elsewhere and managers moving between casino zones, cities and border enclaves. That structure makes raids in any single country insufficient unless suspects, data and funds can be traced across borders.

Indonesia’s recent enforcement action illustrates how these systems work at ground level. In June, police detained 22 suspects in a case involving websites branded Akasia899 and Tanjung899, with servers allegedly based in China and Cambodia. The suspects were accused of creating as many as 500 WhatsApp accounts a day using Indonesian SIM cards to send gambling promotions, then disguising proceeds as payments for goods, converting them into cryptocurrency and laundering them through third-party bank accounts. The case, first reported by Antara and covered in Indonesia’s arrests in a China-Cambodia igaming ring operation, showed how local marketing cells can plug into offshore infrastructure.

That approach explains why China has emphasized extradition and evidence-sharing rather than relying only on domestic prosecutions. If Chinese residents are the customers or victims, but the servers, promoters and call centers sit outside China, investigators need cooperation from host governments to secure devices, financial records and suspects. Liu’s transfer from Cambodia is therefore significant because it brings an alleged organizer into the Chinese court system rather than leaving the case dependent on Cambodian proceedings alone.

Extraditions signal a tougher regional posture

The Liu extradition also follows a series of high-profile moves against Chinese-linked gambling figures outside China. Thailand’s courts recently approved the extradition of She Zhijiang, a Chinese national and Cambodian passport holder accused of running large illegal gambling networks. Prosecutors alleged She founded or operated hundreds of websites with enormous transaction volumes and that his networks reached hundreds of thousands of users. The decision, detailed in coverage of Thailand’s approval of She Zhijiang’s extradition to China, gave Thai authorities a 90-day window to complete the transfer.

She’s case has broader resonance because he was also linked to activity in Myanmar’s Shwe Kokko, an area long associated with casino development, online gambling and allegations of criminal activity near the Thai border. Like Cambodia’s coastal gambling boom, such border zones have attracted scrutiny because they can combine weak local oversight, foreign capital, private security and online platforms that target customers far beyond the host country.

For China, these extraditions serve several purposes. They remove alleged organizers from jurisdictions where political influence, passport status or local business ties may complicate prosecution. They also send a deterrent message to operators who assumed that offshore bases would shield them from Chinese criminal law. And they pressure neighboring governments to show they are not tolerating industries tied to fraud, trafficking and illicit finance.

Cooperation spreads beyond Southeast Asia

China’s campaign is no longer limited to the Mekong region. Beijing has increasingly pursued gambling and fraud suspects in countries that became alternative destinations as enforcement intensified in Cambodia, Myanmar and the Philippines. Sri Lanka is one example. The Chinese Embassy in Colombo said the two countries had expanded joint law enforcement against illegal gambling and fraud networks that had moved from other parts of Southeast Asia and were linked to human trafficking and other crimes.

In that push, China and Sri Lanka expanded cooperation against igaming, with Sri Lankan authorities conducting raids and transferring some Chinese nationals accused of fraud-related offenses to Chinese authorities. The embassy also cited cooperation with Spain, the United Arab Emirates, Myanmar and Cambodia, underscoring how Chinese enforcement has become global in scope when offshore gambling targets Chinese citizens.

The expanding geography matters for the Chen-linked cases because it shows the business is adaptable. When one jurisdiction tightens controls, operators can relocate servers, call centers or payment operations. But the same mobility creates more exposure points. Each country that agrees to raids, deportations or extraditions narrows the safe space for networks that depend on cross-border fragmentation.

The stakes now center on proof and reach

Liu’s extradition gives Chinese investigators a chance to test allegations about Jinbei Group’s structure, Chen’s role and the claimed shift from online gambling into telecoms fraud compounds. Prosecutors will need to connect corporate entities, platform operations, victim flows and command responsibility, particularly where businesses operated under layers of local registration, contractors and intermediaries.

The case also carries diplomatic weight. Cambodia has been under sustained pressure to curb scam compounds and illegal gambling after years of reports linking parts of the sector to trafficking and forced labor. Cooperation with China on a case tied to Chen, a businessman who cultivated elite political and philanthropic ties, signals that Phnom Penh is willing to support Beijing on sensitive enforcement matters when Chinese nationals and Chinese public security interests are involved.

For the gambling industry, the message is direct. Offshore online gambling aimed at Chinese customers is being treated less as a regulatory violation and more as a transnational crime ecosystem connected to fraud, money laundering, illegal detention and violence. The Liu case is one more indication that China intends to follow that ecosystem across borders, bring alleged organizers home and use regional partnerships to dismantle the infrastructure that kept the business offshore.