World Cup gambling ads cause concerns in Toronto

Dig Deeper

The Backstory

World Cup spotlight sharpens Ontario’s ad debate

Toronto’s concern over gambling advertising ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup reflects a broader collision between sports, regulated betting and public health policy. Ontario will be one of the host jurisdictions for a tournament expected to bring intense attention from fans, broadcasters, sponsors and betting operators. That visibility is what has made the province’s advertising rules a political issue before the first match is played.

Ontario opened its regulated online gambling market in 2022, creating one of North America’s most competitive legal betting sectors. The model was designed to shift players away from offshore sites and into a monitored system with consumer protections, responsible gambling obligations and advertising standards. But the same market liberalization also brought a surge in brand visibility. Gambling ads became common around professional sports broadcasts, digital media and celebrity-backed promotions, prompting complaints from parents, clinicians, advocacy groups and some lawmakers.

The World Cup raises the stakes because of its scale. Unlike a domestic season, the tournament compresses global attention into a few weeks and reaches casual viewers who may not usually engage with sports betting. Matches will take place from June 11 to July 19, with North American time zones making games more accessible to audiences across Canada, the U.S. and Latin America. For Ontario officials, that combination creates a risk that gambling marketing becomes more frequent, more targeted and harder for vulnerable consumers to avoid.

FIFA’s commercial push brings betting closer to the tournament

The concerns in Toronto are unfolding as FIFA deepens its commercial ties with betting and adjacent gambling products. The governing body has expanded its relationship with Kaizen Gaming’s Betano, which became the first betting sponsor of the World Cup during the 2022 tournament in Qatar. That deal was initially limited to Europe. FIFA has since extended the arrangement, with Betano set to sponsor the 2026 World Cup in European and Latin American markets.

That expansion signals how central betting has become to the business of major sports. FIFA has projected the enlarged tournament, which will feature 104 matches, to generate US$11 billion in revenue. More matches mean more inventory for broadcasters, sponsors, digital platforms and betting-linked engagement. They also mean more opportunities for operators to build promotions around goals, group-stage outcomes, player performance and tournament futures.

FIFA has also moved beyond traditional sportsbook sponsorships. It has reached agreements with companies tied to data, streaming and prediction markets, including a deal allowing some betting operators to livestream World Cup matches online. Prediction market ADI Predictstreet has also been announced as a World Cup partner. Those arrangements broaden the commercial ecosystem around the tournament and blur lines between sports fandom, financial-style trading and wagering.

For regulators, the shift complicates oversight. A betting ad on television can be assessed under known advertising rules. A prediction market contract, affiliate campaign or livestream-linked offer may fall into different legal categories depending on the jurisdiction. That is especially relevant in Canada, where provinces oversee gambling while federal lawmakers consider broader standards for sports betting advertising.

Operators prepare promotions built for a global audience

Gambling companies are already planning World Cup campaigns designed to convert fan attention into betting activity. In the U.S., BetMGM has tied a World Cup promotion to goals scored by the U.S. men’s national team, offering a US$500,000 bonus-bet pool for each U.S. goal. The structure shows how operators can turn national-team performance into recurring engagement, encouraging customers to place qualifying wagers before matches and follow every scoring chance.

BetMGM’s offer is not available in Ontario, a sign that operators are already adjusting campaigns to local regulatory conditions. But the promotion still illustrates the type of marketing that could proliferate around the tournament: simple mechanics, patriotic framing and bonus-bet rewards tied directly to live match events. Such campaigns may appeal to casual fans who identify with a team more than with gambling itself.

Marketing infrastructure is also expanding ahead of the tournament. Media Troopers has announced a Latin America expansion focused on soccer-driven acquisition channels, localized publisher networks and geo-targeted campaigns in markets such as Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Argentina and Chile. The company cited proximity to North American host cities, similar time zones and regional soccer enthusiasm as reasons for accelerating its LatAm strategy.

That regional push matters for Ontario because World Cup advertising will not be confined by borders. Digital campaigns can be tailored by language, location, device and consumer profile. Affiliates and publishers can amplify operator promotions across social media, search engines and sports content. Even where legal operators follow local rules, the volume of messaging around the tournament may make gambling advertising feel ubiquitous to fans.

Prediction markets add another regulatory layer

The World Cup is also becoming a test case for prediction markets, which allow users to trade contracts tied to event outcomes. These products often resemble financial instruments but can overlap with sports betting when tied to match results or tournament winners. Their growth has drawn attention from gambling regulators, commodities authorities and lawmakers trying to define where betting ends and event trading begins.

Robinhood has expanded its World Cup prediction market offering through Rothera, a derivatives exchange in which Robinhood and Susquehanna International Group acquired a majority stake. The platform plans to handle contracts on match outcomes, the tournament winner and total goals, while some player-related and combination contracts remain available through Kalshi.

The scale is significant. Robinhood said more than 16 billion event contracts have been traded on its platform so far in 2026, surpassing the 12 billion traded in all of 2025. The World Cup could accelerate that growth by introducing prediction markets to sports fans who may already be familiar with betting lines, fantasy contests and in-play odds.

For public health advocates, the concern is that prediction markets may normalize wagering-like behavior under the language of trading. For regulators, the issue is jurisdictional. A sportsbook promotion is generally subject to provincial or state gambling rules. A contract traded through a derivatives exchange may be overseen through a different framework. As World Cup-related products multiply, policymakers in Ontario and elsewhere may face pressure to update advertising rules so they apply to the substance of consumer risk, not only the label on the product.

Illegal gambling risk shadows the regulated market

Ontario’s regulated market is often defended as a safer alternative to offshore gambling, with licensed operators required to meet standards on advertising, player protection and responsible gambling. The Canadian Gaming Association has argued that most online gambling in the province occurs on regulated platforms that must follow those rules. But the World Cup also creates openings for illegal operators that do not face the same obligations.

Other jurisdictions are preparing for that risk. In Malaysia, the communications regulator has said it will intensify online monitoring to curb illegal gambling during the tournament. The agency plans to watch websites, social media platforms and online services used to promote unlawful betting, working with police and internet service providers to restrict access to illegal sites. Its approach, detailed in Malaysia’s plan to step up World Cup gambling enforcement, underscores how major sporting events can drive both legal and illegal betting activity.

The same dynamic is relevant in Canada. Tightening advertising rules for licensed operators could reduce public exposure to gambling messages, especially for minors and vulnerable groups. But if restrictions are too broad or poorly coordinated, regulated companies may argue that offshore operators will fill the gap through social media, search ads, messaging apps and affiliate sites. That tension sits at the center of Ontario’s policy challenge.

The debate is therefore not simply whether there will be more gambling advertising during the World Cup. It is whether regulators can distinguish between legal market visibility, aggressive promotion and illegal solicitation while preserving the consumer protections that justified regulation in the first place.

Policy choices could set the post-World Cup standard

The World Cup is likely to become a stress test for Ontario’s gambling advertising regime. Provincial officials are weighing additional restrictions, while a federal bill proposing a national framework for sports betting ads remains under consideration in Parliament. If adopted, national standards could bring more consistency across provinces, though implementation would still have to account for regional gambling systems and constitutional divisions of authority.

Advertising limits can take many forms. Policymakers could restrict the timing of ads during sports broadcasts, limit inducements such as bonus bets, impose stronger rules on celebrity and athlete endorsements or require clearer responsible gambling messaging. They could also focus on digital channels, where targeted advertising and affiliate marketing can be harder to monitor than television campaigns.

The commercial pressure will be substantial. FIFA’s expanded sponsorships, operator promotions, affiliate campaigns and prediction market products all point to a tournament built for betting engagement. The public policy pressure is rising just as quickly, with advocacy groups warning that exposure can influence betting behavior and increase harm among people already at risk.

Ontario’s decision will reverberate beyond the tournament. A tougher approach could shape how future global sports events are marketed in the province and influence discussions elsewhere in Canada. A lighter approach could preserve flexibility for licensed operators but intensify criticism if gambling ads dominate broadcasts and digital feeds during one of the world’s most watched sporting events. Either way, the World Cup is turning a long-running advertising dispute into an immediate regulatory test.