PAGCOR’s E-games revenue falls 37% yearly in first three quarters

Dig Deeper

The Backstory

A boom gives way to a regulatory reset

PAGCOR’s steep drop in e-games revenue in the first nine months of the year marks a reversal from the surge that made online gaming the Philippine regulator’s largest revenue source. The shift was not driven by one measure alone. It followed a deliberate policy turn: first bringing more operators and players into the regulated market, then raising compliance standards once the sector had scale.

That sequence began under PAGCOR Chairman Alejandro H. Tengco, who moved to make legal online gaming more commercially viable by cutting electronic-gaming fees from levels above 50% to 35% in April 2024, then to 30% at the start of 2025. Operators tied to integrated resorts later received a 25% rate. The lower fees helped licensed e-games grow quickly, with electronic gaming overtaking land-based casinos as the largest component of Philippine gaming revenue.

But the same rapid growth intensified political and regulatory scrutiny. By 2026, the focus had shifted from expansion to control. PAGCOR tightened know-your-customer rules, imposed stricter advertising oversight, accredited more of the business-to-business supply chain and moved against illegal sites. The fall in revenue reported in the first three quarters reflects that second phase, after the market was subjected to payment restrictions, a licensing moratorium and higher operating requirements.

Payment curbs hit the legal market first

The most immediate pressure came from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas’ order delinking online gaming platforms from e-wallets. The move was intended to reduce frictionless access to gambling and address consumer-protection concerns. Its commercial effect was direct: licensed operators lost a convenient funding channel while illegal operators, many operating offshore, continued to adapt through alternative payment routes.

The impact was already visible at midyear. PAGCOR’s first-half revenue fell 26.6% year-on-year to Php43.3 billion as income from Games, eBingo and bingo grantees dropped 41.9% to Php18.6 billion, according to an earlier report on PAGCOR’s first-half revenue decline. Licensed casinos also weakened, though by a smaller margin, while PAGCOR-operated casinos continued their gradual slide as the agency pursues a long-term plan to exit direct casino operations and become a purely regulatory body.

The payment restrictions landed in a market already adjusting to new checks on advertising, player verification and responsible-gaming controls. PAGCOR has framed these changes as necessary for sustainability. Legal advisers tracking the sector have described the downturn less as a collapse than as the cost of moving from rapid channelization to a higher-standard regulated market. A white paper covered in Arden Consult’s analysis of the first-half decline argued that the headline numbers risk mistaking a smaller recorded market for a weaker one.

Licenses become harder to hold passively

PAGCOR’s March 2024 moratorium on new Gaming System Administrator applications has also reshaped the online market. With new entry restricted, existing accreditations became more valuable on paper. At the same time, new minimum fee obligations made it harder for lightly capitalized or dormant operators to sit on licenses while waiting for market conditions to improve.

The Minimum Guaranteed Fee system requires GSAs with electronic casino games to meet a Php9 million monthly minimum fee based on a Php30 million gross gaming revenue benchmark. GSAs without electronic casino games face a Php3 million monthly minimum fee based on a Php15 million benchmark. Those amounts are scheduled to rise in January 2027. The policy is designed to discourage underdeclaration, passive license holding and speculative trading in accreditations.

That has encouraged consolidation and interest from outside investors, but the process is more complex than a simple purchase of a licensed shell. As explained in a report warning investors that buying PAGCOR-accredited igaming companies carries regulatory risk, a change in ownership or control requires PAGCOR board approval. Buyers inherit liabilities, compliance history, unpaid fees, player-fund obligations and possible anti-money-laundering exposure. The license remains subject to continuing regulatory authority, not private transfer by contract.

This matters for the current revenue decline because weaker operators now face pressure from both sides: reduced payment convenience and marketing reach on one side, higher minimum costs and compliance burdens on the other. PAGCOR’s policy goal is to leave a smaller but more transparent market populated by operators able to fund technology, player-protection systems and reporting controls. The risk is that the legal market becomes too costly or cumbersome compared with offshore alternatives.

Advertising rules test channelization

The debate over gambling advertising has become central to the sector’s outlook. Licensed operators remain able to promote their brands, but under tighter pre-screening and content restrictions. Proposals for a broader ban have raised concern that legal operators could lose their main commercial advantage over illegal sites: the ability to be seen publicly and verified by consumers.

A detailed analysis of Senate proposals reported that a total ban could hand market share back to offshore sites, drawing on evidence from countries where licensed advertising was sharply curtailed while illegal operators kept reaching players through digital channels. The report on how a total Philippine gambling ad ban could strengthen illegal operators argued that advertising restrictions bind licensed firms first, while offshore platforms continue using influencers, mirror domains and private messaging networks.

The stakes are not only commercial. PAGCOR’s channelization strategy depends on players knowing which platforms are licensed and subject to safeguards. Legal operators must verify identity and age, use certified systems, observe responsible-gaming requirements and answer to the regulator in disputes. Illegal operators do not honor exclusion lists, pay Philippine taxes or submit to enforcement except through site blocking, which can be evaded through new domains.

PAGCOR has sought to address that identification problem directly. Tengco has said the regulator plans to launch an official app in the fourth quarter of 2026 to help players find legitimate online platforms. The planned tool, reported during the IAG Academy Summit in Manila in a story on PAGCOR’s official app for identifying licensed gaming sites, is intended to steer consumers toward platforms where safeguards and accountability measures are in place.

Remittances raise the fiscal stakes

The revenue decline also has consequences beyond operators and players. PAGCOR is one of the government’s major sources of non-tax revenue, remitting funds to the National Treasury, the Philippine Sports Commission and other mandated beneficiaries. Even as revenue weakened in the first three quarters, the regulator still made substantial contributions to nation-building and statutory obligations.

A Supreme Court ruling has increased the pressure on PAGCOR’s income statement by requiring the agency to remit 5% of gross income to the Philippine Sports Commission, rather than using the previous computation. The ruling’s effect was already clear in the first half, when PAGCOR’s net income fell much more sharply than revenue because mandated remittances rose. The court decision has changed the economics of any downturn: weaker gaming revenue now translates more quickly into lower retained earnings for the regulator.

The legal basis for the PSC’s share traces to Philippine law and judicial interpretation of PAGCOR’s obligations. The Supreme Court decision, available through the judiciary’s law library, outlines the remittance requirement in the dispute over the sports agency’s statutory entitlement: Supreme Court ruling on PAGCOR remittances.

That fiscal link explains why the current decline is politically sensitive. PAGCOR is tightening the sector to improve compliance, reduce harm and weaken illegal operators. But the same actions can reduce recorded revenue in the short term, limiting the funds available for government programs and enforcement. If players migrate from licensed platforms to offshore sites, the state loses visibility, consumer-protection tools and revenue at once.

The next test is calibration

The Philippine online gaming market is now in a balancing phase. PAGCOR has shown it can expand the legal channel by making licensing commercially viable. It is now testing whether it can maintain that channel while imposing tougher standards on payments, advertising, ownership, reporting and responsible gaming.

The first nine months suggest the adjustment is costly. E-games remain PAGCOR’s largest revenue contributor, but the segment’s decline has pulled down overall revenue and sharply reduced net income. Land-based casinos and Casino Filipino branches are also under pressure, leaving the regulator more exposed to the success or failure of its online reset.

The central question is whether the legal market can remain attractive enough for both operators and players. If compliance costs rise while payment access and advertising channels narrow, licensed platforms may struggle to compete with illegal sites that ignore those constraints. If rules are calibrated well, PAGCOR could emerge with a smaller but sturdier sector that generates public revenue, funds enforcement and gives consumers a visible alternative to offshore operators.

The current figures show the cost of that transition. The outcome will depend on whether enforcement against illegal operators keeps pace with the burdens placed on licensed ones.