New Zealand online casino bill gains select committee approval

Dig Deeper

Related stories

2025/10/29: New Zealand raises tax in online gambling bill to enable funding of community groups 2025/10/24: Auckland cricket clubs fear funding loss under New Zealand’s proposed online gambling bill 2025/07/15: New Zealand online gambling legalization bill clears first hurdle 2025/07/02: New Zealand introduces online casino bill to parliament

The Backstory

Why this bill matters now

New Zealand is moving to bring a gray online casino market under domestic control after years of offshore operators serving local players without local rules or tax. The government’s Online Casino Gambling Bill sets a ceiling of 15 licenses and would for the first time let approved platforms advertise, with the Department of Internal Affairs supervising the market. The measure aims to exchange a permissive status quo for a regulated regime with player protections, spending tools and penalties for noncompliance. The stakes are high: community sport and social services have long relied on grants from land-based gaming proceeds, while consumer advocates warn that legal online casinos could increase exposure and harm if oversight falls short.

The political calculus shifted this year as lawmakers advanced the bill from first reading to select committee, then to a recommendation stage. Support has softened as opposition parties lined up against the proposal and the vote became a conscience issue. Industry and community groups have pressed for changes that ensure online proceeds benefit local clubs and charities, mirroring the returns mandated in the physical “Class 4” pokie sector. The current debate is over who pays, who benefits and how fast the state can pivot from an unregulated environment to one that protects players without undercutting community funding.

From introduction to first reading

Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden introduced the framework in June, pitching a capped-license system to pull offshore gambling into the domestic net and prioritize consumer safeguards. The proposal would open an auction for up to 15 licenses, allow restricted advertising and fine unlicensed sites up to NZ$5 million. That set the terms for a debate that turned on whether regulation would shrink harm or normalize widespread online casino play.

Parliament gave the bill early momentum when it cleared its first reading and went to the select committee with a strong majority. Supporters said licensing would impose age checks, compliance transparency and contributions to the Problem Gambling Levy. The minister had earlier framed the goal as making online play safer, not bigger, when she tabled the bill and outlined caps, fines and a February auction timeline. Those early steps set expectations for tight controls and clear funding flows but left open how the online model would return money to the community.

Community funding flashpoint

Pushback intensified as sports leaders and local clubs warned of a hole in grassroots financing. The Class 4 system requires at least 40% of net proceeds to go back to communities through grants, a pipeline that sends about NZ$170 million a year to local sport and other groups. Opponents argued the bill did not replicate that principle for online operators, risking a shift away from grants toward corporate balance sheets.

That critique came into focus as more than 50 sporting bodies united to oppose the bill’s omission of mandated community returns. Leaders said clubs—not professional teams—rely on gaming trust grants to pay for coaches, facilities and participation costs. The alarm was particularly sharp in Auckland, where the Auckland Cricket Association warned that dozens of clubs and nearly 13,000 players could be hit if grant flows weaken, forcing higher fees and reducing access for children and lower income families.

In response, the government moved to harden fiscal provisions. It raised the offshore gambling duty from 12% to 16% and earmarked the extra 4% for community funding. Officials said the change answered public feedback and would not cut existing contributions from Class 4 gaming, Lotto or TAB. A two-year review is built in to assess the impact. The select committee went further, proposing that 25% of the online gambling duty be transferred to the Lottery Grants Board for distribution—an attempt to create a predictable, audited channel for returns even as the market shifts online.

Harm, advertising and enforcement

The policy hinges on whether regulation can curb harm while displacing offshore sites. The licensing framework, as laid out at first reading, would require operators to show robust harm prevention plans, apply strong age checks, contribute to the Problem Gambling Levy and face meaningful penalties for breaches. Advertising would be allowed but constrained, with rules still to be finalized. Advocates argue that legal, supervised operators will be easier to police and less likely to target vulnerable groups than unlicensed sites now accessible to any adult with a phone.

Critics counter that permission to advertise will intensify exposure, amplify brand wars for market share and normalize online casino play, especially among at-risk communities. That tension surfaced as the bill advanced, with the industry seeking clarity on ad rules and community leaders urging tight curbs near schools, youth programming and times when minors are online. Implementation timelines also matter. The government has signaled that licensed platforms could launch as early as late next year, but a national self-exclusion register is not expected until December 2027, leaving a gap between market opening and a key protection tool.

Politics of a conscience vote

The select committee weighed nearly 5,000 submissions, most focused on the risk to community funding and the potential for increased harm. As the findings landed, political dynamics hardened. The Greens, Labour and the Maori Party opposed the legislation, and the measure became a conscience vote, stripping party whips of their usual leverage. That raises uncertainty over the bill’s final path even with committee backing.

Supporters inside government argue the package pairs a domestic licensing system with a crackdown on offshore operators, boosts public returns through a higher duty and Lottery Grants Board transfers, and builds in reviews to recalibrate settings. Opponents see a structural shift away from grant-driven community support and warn that advertising and access could expand gambling harm. The choice for undecided MPs is whether the regulated model’s safeguards, fiscal design and enforcement plan are strong enough to justify opening the door to legal online casinos.

What to watch next

Three tests will determine the outcome. First, whether the government can lock in a durable funding formula for community groups that resembles the Class 4 model in reliability, if not in structure, and prove the Lottery Grants Board channel will be timely and transparent. Second, whether advertising rules, affordability checks and enforcement can launch in sync with licensing to avoid a protection gap before the self-exclusion register goes live. Third, whether a conscience vote fractured by party lines can produce a stable majority for passage.

The broader stakes extend beyond New Zealand. Many jurisdictions wrestling with offshore gambling rely on tax, licensing caps and targeted advertising limits to rebalance consumer protection with market reality. If Parliament can reconcile community funding with a modern online regime, it could offer a template for small markets where club sport and social services depend on gaming returns. If not, the status quo—offshore access with limited safeguards and no domestic reinvestment—will hold, along with the political costs of inaction. The next votes will determine which risk lawmakers prefer to own.