New Zealand ilottery owner pleads guilty to conducting illegal gambling

26 January 2026 at 7:13am UTC-5
Email, LinkedIn, and more

Waiariki Mcllroy-Jones, Owner and Director of New Zealand ilottery company Jonez LRC Ltd., and his company have pleaded guilty in Christchurch District Court to conducting illegal gambling and making pecuniary gain from unlawful gambling.

Mcllyroy-Jones was found to benefit from the sale of ilottery tickets offering prizes of high-value cars, boats, cash, and a freehold house.

Article continues below ad
PayNearMe

After an investigation by New Zealand’s Department of Internal Affairs, the lottery was found not to be licensed, as it was required under New Zealand law because of its scale.

The prosecution is said to be the first of an ilottery in the country, which Vicki Scott of the Department of Internal Affairs Director of Gambling, told 1News “clearly signals our lack of tolerance for anyone who tries to evade the strict controls in the Gambling Act that are there to ensure gambling is fair, well-run and responsible, and that any potential harm is minimized to keep our communities safe. It also means money goes back to the community.”

Under New Zealand’s Gambling Act 2003, gambling with prizes that exceed AU$5000 (US$3,457)1 AUD = 0.6914 USD
2026-01-26Powered by CMG CurrenShift
can only be conducted by non-profit organizations and requires a gambling license to ensure integrity.

Proceeds and assets are expected to be forfeited under the Criminal Proceeds Recovery Act 2009 and are being held under a High Court restraining order.

On 29 May, Mcllroy-Jones and Jonez LRC Ltd. will return to court for sentencing.

New Zealand has been working to regulate igaming ahead of its icasino launch, expected at the end of 2026, by introducing a bill that would ban credit card use on the platforms.

Abi Bray brings strong researching skills to the forefront of all of her writing, whether it’s the newest slots, industry trends or the ever changing legislation across the U.S, Asia and Australia, she maintains a keen eye for detail and a passion for reporting.

CiG Insignia
Locations:
Verticals:
Sectors:
Topics:

Dig Deeper

The Backstory

How an illicit ilottery collided with a shifting rulebook

New Zealand’s first prosecution of an online lottery operator lands amid a broader reset of how governments police digital wagering. Regulators are pursuing unlicensed schemes while building pathways for legal play, a dual-track strategy that underscores both consumer protection and revenue aims. The Department of Internal Affairs has cast the Christchurch case as a line in the sand, telling 1News the action “clearly signals our lack of tolerance” for evading controls designed to keep gambling fair and responsible. That stance sets the tone for the next phase of the market’s evolution as the country readies formal online casino licensing.

The case centers on an operator selling tickets for high-value prizes — houses, cars, boats — without the necessary authorization for a draw of that scale. Under the Gambling Act 2003, only approved nonprofit entities can run large-prize lotteries. With proceeds subject to forfeiture under the Criminal Proceeds Recovery Act 2009, authorities are telegraphing that digital distance will not shield operators from traditional enforcement. The timing is telling: as lawmakers shape an online casino framework for late 2026, the government is moving to ringfence activity and channel it under license.

The prosecution deepens a theme playing out in multiple markets: legal clarity drives investment while compliance breaches attract swifter penalties. Where regulators have moved first to define rules, product launches and partnerships have followed. Where rules lag or are ignored, courts and law enforcement are stepping in.

A crackdown paired with reforms

Wellington’s policy pivot is already visible. The government has proposed a ban on credit card payments for online casinos, part of a bid to secure votes for the Online Casino Bill and anchor harm-minimization into the model. Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden framed it as a guardrail to reduce the risk of players “making their way into further debt.” The bill would issue up to 15 licenses and steer duty to community funds. The credit card ban, along with a higher duty rate, is designed to sweeten the proposal’s political viability, even if it prompts questions about how attractive the licenses will be. Read more on the credit card proposal and the bill’s revenue design in our coverage of New Zealand’s planned payments ban and licensing plan.

While New Zealand aligns rules with social policy goals, the prosecution signals the enforcement half of the equation. Authorities are targeting operations that mimic licensed schemes — offering splashy prizes and national-scale participation — without the compliance obligations that carry audits, duty payments and community returns. In this case, officials say the draw’s size demanded a license, as well as adherence to the nonprofit requirement, a bright-line standard under existing law. The High Court restraining order over assets pending forfeiture shows how the criminal proceeds regime is being applied to online gambling revenue streams.

Crosscurrents: integrity scares and consumer protection

The legal focus is not confined to lotteries. Sports integrity risks continue to test enforcement and league governance. In the United States, Miami Heat guard Terry Rozier pleaded not guilty to federal charges that he shared information to aid bettors wagering on his performance when he played for Charlotte. The NBA placed Rozier on unpaid administrative leave, triggering a union grievance. The case, which emerged from a broader FBI probe into illegal sports betting and insider information, has forced leagues and sportsbooks to revisit safeguards. Our report on the Rozier case and the NBA’s response outlines how law enforcement pressure can reshape internal compliance standards as quickly as new products expand the betting universe.

For policymakers, the thread is consistent: the more digital and data-driven gambling becomes, the more regulators target conduct that undermines trust — whether that is unlicensed prize draws or alleged manipulation of player outcomes. New Zealand’s move to bar credit cards reflects the same calculus. Limiting higher-risk payment methods is meant to insulate consumers without ceding the field to offshore sites, a balance that many jurisdictions are still trying to strike.

Legal channels expand as content race heats up

Where frameworks are clear, the ilottery market is scaling quickly. Courier services that digitize ticket purchases are reaching more U.S. states, bringing convenience and verification under regulated umbrellas. In Arizona, online courier Jackpot.com launched ilottery ticketing and “Scratchers,” an interactive digital scratch format, extending its footprint to eight states. The company has also secured partnerships with retailers to integrate online ordering with established convenience channels. See details of the Arizona rollout and the retailer tie-ups in our story on Jackpot.com’s latest state expansion.

At the platform level, government-regulated lotteries are broadening their content menus. Scientific Games added London-based studio Pixiu Gaming to its SG Content Hub to deliver titles built on globally recognized brands such as Monopoly and Battleship, through a tie-up with Hasbro. The strategy: use familiar intellectual property to diversify play styles and attract new demographics while keeping play in a controlled environment. Read more on Pixiu’s entry to Scientific Games’ ilottery hub and the role of branded content in ilottery growth. For background on the licensing backbone of this strategy, see Hasbro’s agreement with Scientific Games extended through 2025 in the company’s announcement here.

States are also adopting full-stack ilottery platforms. The Massachusetts State Lottery Commission selected Aristocrat Interactive to power its online lottery from July 1, 2026, with a five-year term and an option to extend. Officials cast the move as core to modernizing services and boosting funding for early childhood education. The deal follows Aristocrat’s wins in New Hampshire and Michigan, signaling a consolidating supplier landscape as lotteries seek proven tech, content and responsible gaming features. Our coverage of the Massachusetts contract award to Aristocrat Interactive highlights how procurement priorities are evolving.

Why this matters for New Zealand’s next steps

The Christchurch case arrives as the country tries to square three goals: protect consumers, ensure proceeds flow to communities and capture tax from activity already happening online. Successful crackdowns on unlicensed operators can clear space for a regulated market by signaling consequences and deterring gray-market growth. Yet the credit card ban and higher duty also test commercial appeal. Operators must assess whether responsible gaming constraints and payment limits depress customer acquisition or simply nudge play toward bank transfers and e-wallets.

International precedents suggest trade-offs can be managed if licensing is predictable and content remains compelling. U.S. lotteries are leaning on recognizable brands, new play mechanics and retail-digital bridges to expand responsibly. If New Zealand calibrates payments policy, duty, community returns and licensing scope, it can channel demand without fueling an offshore exodus.

The stakes extend beyond one courtroom. Clear wins for enforcement legitimize the broader regulatory project. As DIA’s comments to 1News underline, the government wants gambling to be “fair, well-run and responsible,” with money flowing back to communities. The next test is translating that objective into a market that is attractive enough to draw players and operators into the light — and strict enough to keep them there.

What to watch

Sentencing in the Christchurch case will clarify the financial risk for would-be copycats. Parliamentary debate on the Online Casino Bill will determine whether the credit card ban and duty levels stick. Suppliers eyeing the market will watch for technical requirements and responsible gaming mandates that shape product design. And as other jurisdictions expand ilottery with branded content and integrated platforms, expect New Zealand to borrow playbooks — and enforcement tactics — to balance growth with guardrails.