Indian politician accused of laundering INR23 billion through illegal online gambling operations

Dig Deeper

Related stories

2025/03/31: Indian politician calls for better igaming regulations in Tamil Nadu 2025/11/28: Indian authorities arrest gambling executives over money laundering 2025/01/16: Former mayor Alice Guo accused of gambling-related money laundering in the Philippines 2025/09/16: Indian former MP and actor accused of endorsing illegal betting app

The Backstory

Why this probe matters now

India’s financial crime agency has pressed its largest recent case against alleged gambling-linked laundering, moving a long-simmering enforcement trend to the political arena. The Enforcement Directorate’s charges reflect familiar patterns investigators say they are seeing across illicit betting: funds funneled through payment gateways, layered across mule accounts and foreign entities, and parked in crypto or offshore assets. The scale alleged here underscores how gray-market gaming has evolved into a cross-border compliance test for banks, tech platforms and regulators.

The agency has spent the past year building cases that trace money flows from India to hubs in the United States, Singapore and the Middle East, mirroring a playbook it has described in other actions. In parallel, state and federal policymakers are struggling to draw a bright line between permissible online skill games and outright gambling, while courts weigh nationwide restrictions. The stakes are rising for politicians, celebrities and startups whose endorsements or products sit near that line.

A widening crackdown on online betting

The Enforcement Directorate has pursued executives, product designs and bank accounts it claims were used to operate illegal betting under the guise of esports or social gaming. In November, the agency arrested two co-founders of Winzo, alleging they ran an illegal gambling service and shifted proceeds abroad using subsidiaries and manipulated game algorithms to tilt outcomes. Prosecutors told a Bengaluru court the accused targeted players in Brazil, Germany, the U.S. and India and moved profits to the U.S. and Singapore, with foreign accounts holding about $55 million. That case is detailed in the arrests of Winzo executives over money laundering.

Weeks later, authorities escalated the financial angle. They seized INR 5.9 billion in Winzo-linked bank accounts and securities under foreign exchange rules, alleging the company offered real-money games overseas while running the infrastructure from India and disguising funds as overseas investment. Investigators said the U.S. and Singapore entities lacked independent staff or operations and were managed from India, a template they say matches how illicit operators obscure jurisdiction and supervision.

Courts are now being asked to decide whether to go further. India’s Supreme Court recently sought the central government’s view on a public interest plea for a national ban on platforms that present gambling as esports or social play, a potential pivot from piecemeal state-by-state enforcement. That request surfaced alongside the Winzo arrests, underscoring how law enforcement and judicial review are moving in tandem.

Endorsements under the microscope

Enforcement pressure is also reaching brand ambassadors and public figures alleged to have boosted black-market apps. The agency questioned former MP and actor Mimi Chakraborty over suspected links to 1xBet, a platform Indian authorities say has operated illegally. Investigators are probing the nature of any endorsements, payments and financial ties, and have called in other high-profile figures, including actor and 1xBet ambassador Urvashi Rautela, while former cricketers Suresh Raina and Shikhar Dhawan have also faced questions. The evolving probe is outlined in the investigation into alleged endorsements of an illegal betting app.

The celebrity angle reflects two linked risks for regulators: consumer harm from deceptive promotions and the legitimization of apps that claim to offer games of skill but, according to investigators, manipulate odds or outcomes. Authorities have cited losses borne by users and investors, and the government has moved to block dozens of platforms after estimating that hundreds of millions of Indians lose billions of dollars annually to such schemes.

States push rules as courts and Delhi weigh in

The policy landscape remains fragmented, with state governments advancing their own prohibitions and licensing regimes while awaiting federal guidance. In Tamil Nadu, political leaders have pressed for stricter oversight and faster implementation of existing law, citing social harms and deaths attributed to online wagering. PMK leader Dr. Anbumani Ramadoss recently urged the state to fully enforce its prohibitions and expand safeguards, pointing to the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Online Gambling and Regulation of Online Games Act and the 2025 rules governing real-money games. Those rules are under legal challenge by operators arguing that skill-based formats should be permitted.

The tension between state bans and industry claims of protected “skill” offerings has created uneven enforcement and legal ambiguity. That ambiguity, officials say, is exploited by platforms that market as skill games while embedding betting mechanics, or that geo-route operations and payments to place activity outside any single regulator’s grasp.

Cross-border money trails and regional echoes

India’s investigative focus on offshore subsidiaries, layered transactions and crypto mirrors a wider regional pivot. In the Philippines, prosecutors approved 62 money laundering counts against former mayor Alice Guo tied to an offshore gaming compound that authorities say was used for gambling as well as love, investment and crypto scams. The case also carries human trafficking charges, highlighting how illegal gambling hubs can co-locate with broader cybercrime.

Philippine regulators had rebranded POGOs as Internet Gaming Licensees in late 2023 and later moved to ban such operators effective Jan. 1, 2025, reflecting mounting concerns over crime and diplomatic fallout. For Indian authorities, those developments underscore both the mobility of operators and the need for coordinated cross-border enforcement, including information sharing on payment processors, shell companies and nominee directors.

What to watch next

Three threads will shape the fallout. First, the extent to which investigators can tie political or corporate actors to specific laundering channels, including payment gateways and crypto exchanges, will determine asset recoveries and future prosecutions. The Winzo cases show the agency’s readiness to pair money laundering allegations with foreign exchange violations to freeze funds quickly, as seen in the INR 5.9 billion seizure.

Second, the Supreme Court’s response to calls for a national ban—or alternatively for a harmonized, central framework distinguishing skill games from gambling—could reset the market. A clear federal standard would narrow the gray zone operators leverage across state borders and app stores.

Third, the risk calculus for advertisers, influencers and payment intermediaries is changing. As probes into celebrity endorsements of alleged illegal betting apps expand, expect tighter know-your-customer expectations for sponsors and stricter compliance by gateways and wallets handling high-velocity gaming payments. Regional moves, including the Philippines’ actions against offshore gaming compounds, suggest that cross-border cooperation—and scrutiny of online gaming’s financial plumbing—will intensify from here.

Taken together, these developments frame the latest Enforcement Directorate case not as an outlier, but as part of a coordinated effort to curtail illicit betting’s financial networks. The outcome will signal how far India intends to go in redrawing the boundary between online entertainment and illegal gambling—and who will bear the cost when the line is crossed.