Australian A-League captain accused of exploiting teammates in betting scandal
A Sydney court has heard that the former captain of the Australian A-League team Macarthur Bulls, Ulises Davila, exploited his leadership role as part of a betting scam.
Ex-Bulls players Kearyn Baccus, 33, and Clayton Lewis, 27, admitted they were each paid AU$10,000 (US$6,652)1 AUD = 0.6652 USD
2025-09-17Powered by CMG CurrenShift by Davila after deliberately earning cautions during a December 2023 match against Sydney FC.
According to Baccus’s lawyer Bryan Wrench, the former captain was at the heart of the scam.
“Davila was not only the captain of the team, but the captain of the scheme. He was the one who organised it. He directed it. He continued it,” he said.
Prosecutors allege Davila acted as a conduit to a Colombian criminal figure known as J Col, orchestrating 50 suspicious wagers through the Bogota-based operator BetPlay.
According to court documents, the bets generated more than AU$200,000 (US$133,047)1 AUD = 0.6652 USD
2025-09-17Powered by CMG CurrenShift in winnings.
Neither Baccus nor Lewis is accused of placing bets themselves, but all three players were suspended by Macarthur FC following their arrests. Baccus and Lewis, who have since left the club, pleaded guilty to corrupting betting outcomes, which carries a potential maximum 10-year jail term.
Davila faces nine charges and will return to court later this month.
Elsewhere in Australia, the Australian federal government has recently been pushing for gambling advertisement reform, restricting advertisements during sports events and children’s programming.
Abi Bray brings strong researching skills to the forefront of all of her writing, whether it’s the newest slots, industry trends or the ever changing legislation across the U.S, Asia and Australia, she maintains a keen eye for detail and a passion for reporting.
Verticals:
Sectors:
Topics:
Dig Deeper
Related stories
The Backstory
Why this case matters now
The alleged yellow-card betting scheme swirling around Macarthur FC did not emerge in a vacuum. It lands at the intersection of surging in-play wagering, growing use of offshore books and a regulatory push to shore up sports integrity. The episode — in which prosecutors say former captain Ulises Dávila arranged for teammates to deliberately earn cautions linked to prop bets — has already produced guilty pleas from two players and AU$200,000-plus in suspicious winnings routed through a Colombian operator, according to court filings. It also arrives as Australian officials debate tougher advertising rules for gambling during live sports and children’s programming, while clubs and leagues reassess whether their internal integrity systems can keep pace with fast-evolving betting markets.
The stakes reach beyond one club or code. The case underscores how microbetting on discrete moments — a card here, a substitution there — can entice manipulation at relatively low personal risk but high systemic cost. It also exposes gaps when wagers migrate offshore, where oversight of account holders, bet patterns and information flows can be thinner. As authorities prepare for further court hearings, the broader question is whether the existing guardrails for professional and semi-professional sports are fit for a real-time betting era.
Early rulings show leniency for players, pressure on systems
The first outcomes from the Sydney proceedings offered a signal of how courts may weigh culpability among participants in such schemes. Two ex-Macarthur players, Kearyn Baccus and Clayton Lewis, received two-year conditional release orders after admitting misconduct tied to a Dec. 9, 2023 match in which bets were placed on Macarthur receiving at least four yellow cards. The court ordered both to repay AU$10,000 each — payments they acknowledged taking from their then-captain — but the magistrate stopped short of convictions, calling their roles “reckless” rather than calculated corruption. That judgement, detailed in a report on the A-League pair avoiding convictions, also highlighted the judge’s view that proof was insufficient they knew they were corrupting a betting outcome.
Macarthur, for its part, said Australian football’s integrity systems show “serious deficiencies” and lack the responsiveness required for cases of this scale, urging reforms. Prosecutors, meanwhile, have pressed ahead with a broader case focused on alleged orchestration and offshore wagering conduits. The early split — leniency for foot soldiers, sharper scrutiny for organizers — mirrors a pattern seen in recent sports betting cases globally, where authorities differentiate between those driving the scheme and those drawn into it for modest payments or under team hierarchy.
Microbets, offshore books and a widening target map
Microbetting’s growth is reshaping incentives in lower-profile competitions as well as elite leagues. In New Zealand, an amateur men’s competition has drawn heavy attention from overseas gamblers, with wagers on a single game reaching into the seven figures and an estimated NZ$212 million bet across a season. While no match-fixing has been proven, the scale and speed of offshore markets, combined with underpaid players and limited scrutiny, heighten integrity risks. As coverage of the New Zealand league’s offshore betting scrutiny notes, microbets like first touch or next card create precise, manipulable outcomes that are attractive to fixers and harder for officials to police in real time.
Australia’s case echoes those vulnerabilities. Prosecutors allege a string of suspicious wagers placed through a Bogota-based operator delivered six-figure payouts tied to disciplinary props. Offshore operators can complicate evidence trails, hampering local regulators’ ability to freeze accounts, verify identities or match betting patterns with on-field events. As sports add data-driven betting products, the availability of granular markets appears to be outpacing the monitoring and education programs aimed at players in lower tiers and recent transfers — a gap integrity officers say needs urgent attention.
Enforcement tightens from bookends: bettors and bookmakers
Regulatory and legal responses are intensifying on multiple fronts. In the United States, a Brooklyn federal judge recently imposed a two-year prison term on a bettor who used nonpublic information to profit from NBA player performance wagers. The sentencing, detailed in reporting on the first prison sentence in an NBA betting scandal, established a marker for how courts may treat scheme facilitators even when athletes’ cases remain pending. The judge’s message was blunt: without intermediaries and bettors willing to exploit illicit edges, the schemes cannot function.
At the operator level, Australian regulators have escalated scrutiny of compliance programs. Financial watchdog AUSTRAC launched legal proceedings against Entain Group in December, alleging systemic anti-money laundering failures that left the company at risk of criminal exploitation. The case has been followed by leadership turnover, including the resignation of Entain Australia’s longtime CFO. Coverage of the Entain Australia executive resignation underscores how lapses in risk assessment and transaction monitoring can create openings for suspicious activity tied to betting markets — a risk vector that overlaps with sports integrity concerns when offshore channels and prop-heavy products are in play.
Public pressure grows on marketing and player protections
Legal action is also extending to how sportsbooks attract and retain customers. In Baltimore, city officials sued DraftKings and FanDuel, accusing them of exploiting vulnerable bettors through promotions and data-driven targeting. The complaint, outlined in reporting on Baltimore’s lawsuit against DraftKings and FanDuel, argues these tactics deepen harms among those struggling with addiction, raising questions about the industry’s responsible gambling safeguards as betting becomes ubiquitous in sports broadcasts and apps. While the case turns on U.S. consumer protection and local law, the larger political dynamic is familiar in Australia, where officials have floated tougher limits on gambling advertising during games and youth programming.
The Macarthur matter adds momentum to that policy debate. If players at a top-flight club can be drawn into microbet manipulation tied to offshore wagers, advocates say, then curbing aggressive marketing and strengthening education and reporting lines may be necessary complements to enforcement. Clubs, leagues and regulators face a credibility test: whether they can translate headline-grabbing cases into rules and resources that deter copycats and protect competitions down the pyramid.
The road ahead for Australian football
For now, the legal process continues, with prosecutors pursuing charges that focus on coordination and financial links to overseas betting accounts. The conditional release orders for two players suggest courts may reserve the harshest penalties for organizers while nudging leagues to improve integrity frameworks. Macarthur’s public call for reform signals clubs want clearer escalation paths, faster data sharing with sportsbooks and regulators, and education that addresses the realities of microbetting and social pressure inside locker rooms.
The broader lesson mirrors developments abroad: enforcement that targets both ends of the market — from bettors leveraging nonpublic cues to operators with lax controls — can shrink the space for manipulation. But prevention will hinge on better surveillance of niche and prop markets, cross-border cooperation on suspicious bets and credible support for players who report approaches. As Australian officials weigh advertising reforms and compliance expectations tighten, the outcome of this case will help define how the country balances a booming betting market with the integrity of its games.
