Stake, VGW, and Dabble among Australian operators eyeing New Zealand online casino licenses

Dig Deeper

The Backstory

A regulated market draws offshore demand

New Zealand’s plan to license online casinos has moved from policy design to a competitive race for market access, drawing interest from Australian-founded operators, incumbent local gambling groups and global betting companies. The current contest reflects a simple commercial calculation: a market long served by offshore sites is about to become formally regulated, capped and potentially lucrative.

The government’s framework creates up to 15 online casino licenses, awarded through a competitive process and limited to three licenses per operator. That cap has turned the licensing round into an early test of how New Zealand balances consumer protection, tax capture and competition in a sector where demand already exists but has often flowed to offshore operators outside domestic oversight.

The Department of Internal Affairs formally opened the expression-of-interest phase in July, allowing potential applicants to declare their intent and provide information on ownership, brands, platforms, existing licenses, source of funds and any regulatory history. The process carries a NZ$19,000 fee and requires access to at least NZ$7.5 million in capital, according to the government’s invitation for operators to submit expressions of interest.

From offshore activity to a capped licensing model

New Zealand announced in July 2024 that it would move to license and regulate online casinos. Officials framed the decision not as the creation of a new gambling market but as an effort to bring an existing one within enforceable rules. That distinction has shaped the policy debate. Regulators are seeking to channel players toward approved sites, reduce black-market exposure and impose standards on advertising, harm minimization and operator conduct.

The model is closed rather than open-ended. Only a fixed number of operators can enter, and each license is tied to a specific platform or brand. Licenses run for an initial three-year period, with the possibility of one renewal for up to five years. That structure gives successful bidders a valuable scarcity asset while giving regulators a manageable group of companies to supervise.

The Online Casino Gambling Act 2026, which came into force May 1, established the core regime. Under the transition arrangements described in earlier coverage, unlicensed offshore operators face a cutoff after which only licensed companies may serve New Zealand customers. That shift is the causative force behind the present rush: companies that have built scale in digital wagering now face a choice between securing formal authorization or losing access to a regulated New Zealand customer base.

Industry compliance advisers have viewed the approach as a possible alternative to markets that opened broadly, then tightened after aggressive advertising and player-acquisition battles. BetComply co-founder Mike de Graaff described New Zealand as a “good test case” for a calmer licensing structure, arguing that a limited field could reduce the incentive for operators to overstep to win share. His comments came as the bill advanced and companies prepared for the licensing round, as reported in coverage of New Zealand’s closed licensing regime.

Incumbents pushed for a smaller field

The cap of 15 licenses did not satisfy all domestic stakeholders. SkyCity Entertainment Group, which operates land-based casinos in New Zealand and Australia, pushed for the number to be reduced to five and argued that licenses should be limited to New Zealand companies. TAB New Zealand also favored a smaller pool, seeking five to seven licenses and warning that a broad opening could leave domestic operators exposed to multinational competition.

Those arguments reflected more than regulatory philosophy. Incumbents were protecting existing revenue streams and market positions. SkyCity already operates an online casino from Malta and has signaled interest in a New Zealand license, while TAB holds the exclusive license for online racing and sports betting. A licensed online casino market could complement those businesses, but it could also cannibalize them or weaken their relative market power if major international brands gain approval.

Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden rejected the premise that the regime should favor local incumbents. She said the government’s role was to create a fair, regulated marketplace rather than protect SkyCity or other established operators. She also warned that domestic preference could raise trade-agreement concerns. The debate, detailed in SkyCity’s call for New Zealand to limit online gaming licenses to five, showed how the licensing design became a proxy fight over market share, tax residency and control of gambling profits.

The government’s decision to retain a broader 15-license cap signaled that it wanted meaningful competition, but not an unrestricted market. That middle position helps explain why operators from Australia and beyond are now circling. The regime is limited enough to make each license scarce, but open enough that foreign-linked brands can credibly compete.

Entain’s local position raises the stakes

Entain enters the process with one of the strongest local footholds. The company runs TAB’s online racing and sports betting operations and has already said it intends to bid for multiple online casino licenses. If successful, it could combine sports betting, racing and casino products in a way few rivals can match in New Zealand.

The company has also reorganized its New Zealand leadership ahead of the market opening, appointing Chris Haigh as managing director of its local operation. That move, covered in Entain’s New Zealand leadership revamp, underlined how operators are preparing institutionally, not just filing paperwork. Leadership structure, compliance systems and local strategy will matter in a process that asks for detailed information on ownership, licensing history and key individuals.

Entain’s presence also sharpens the policy stakes. If the company secures multiple licenses, it could extend an already significant local role into casino gaming. If it fails, New Zealand’s online casino market may develop separately from the existing sports and racing monopoly. Either outcome will influence product bundling, advertising strategy and the degree to which customers remain within established domestic gambling channels.

Advertising rules show a stricter posture

New Zealand’s regulatory design is not limited to market-entry controls. Officials have already moved to restrict promotional conduct, including a ban on celebrity endorsements in online casino advertising and AI-generated likenesses. The measure followed concerns about deepfake ads using public figures without consent and fraudulent gambling promotions designed to harvest personal and financial information.

The ban, described in New Zealand’s prohibition on AI celebrity online casino endorsements, reflects the government’s broader harm-reduction posture. It also gives operators an early signal: licensing will come with meaningful constraints on how brands build recognition and acquire customers.

Penalties for breaches can reach NZ$5 million, making advertising compliance a material financial issue rather than a reputational concern alone. For new entrants, that could change launch economics. Operators accustomed to high-intensity digital marketing in other jurisdictions may need to adapt to a more controlled environment in which brand trust, product quality and responsible-gambling systems carry greater weight.

A billion-dollar opportunity with policy risk

The commercial prize is substantial. SkyCity has estimated the future market at about NZ$1 billion, a figure that helps explain why companies with Australian links, international licenses and digital platforms are assessing bids. Stake, VGW, Dabble, Entain and SkyCity each bring different strategic motivations, from market expansion to defensive positioning against new competitors.

But scarcity and regulation also create risk. A failed bid could leave an operator excluded from a market it once served or hoped to enter. A successful bid will require investment in compliance, local market controls and responsible-gambling measures under a regime still being tested. The limited number of licenses could support stable returns, but it also raises the political visibility of each operator’s conduct.

The current field of interested companies is therefore the product of several prior decisions: New Zealand chose regulation over prohibition, a capped model over open licensing, competitive access over local preference and stricter advertising rules before launch. Together, those choices have created a market that is attractive because it is limited and legitimate, but demanding because missteps could invite tighter controls before the sector fully matures.