Sportradar sale a positive, Jefferies analyst says
Sportradar has sold its Atrium Sports subsidiary for US$170 million, in a deal applauded by Jefferies Equity Research analyst David Katz. Teamworks Innovations is the buyer of the analytics firm.
According to Katz, the all-cash transaction encompasses “team-facing products used by professional and collegiate organizations for video analysis, scouting, coaching, and player evaluation.” But it does not include video production, graphics development or computer-vision technology, all of which are retained by Sportradar.
The Jefferies analyst characterized the sale as an incremental positive for Sportradar stock, streamlining the company while getting a good price for a non-core asset. Management could buy more stock at a discounted price, he said.
Katz that the deal raised money off of an asset not integral to Sportradar’s mission. He added that “the sector has been challenged by the complexities associated with prediction markets and moderating handle volumes, coupled with the company specific pressures applied by concerns over Sportradar’s gray market engagement (which we consider overblown), [but] we expect a positive reaction to the announcement.”
Sportradar’s perspective on the sale was it would tighten the company’s focus around iGaming, sports betting and media franchises. In addition, the assets were sold at a cash-flow valuation in excess of 10 times, also accretive to the balance sheet.
Katz recommended stock repurchases as the best and highest use of the newfound capital. Sportradar shares had fallen to a 6.5-times-cash flow valuation, down from a high of 16.3 times in the first quarter of 2023. The analyst noted that Sportradar had US$170 million in dry powder for share buybacks, atop US$828 million authorized and US$422 million exercised.
“While (mergers and acquisitions) remains part of the company’s long-term strategy, we expect management to remain selective and opportunistic, with a focus on assets that strengthen its core betting, gaming, media, and technology businesses,” Katz added.
However, Katz said “limited incremental investment” was needed in order for Sportradar to continue pursuing prediction markets and other such opportunities. “As a result, we believe the combination of a sharper strategic focus, additional balance sheet flexibility, and lower near-term reinvestment needs supports a greater emphasis on shareholder return,” he wrote.
Sportradar shares were trading at $12.18 per share at the time of Katz’s 7 October report. He retained a US$14 per share price target on the stock.
David McKee is an award-winning journalist who has three decades of experience covering the gaming industry.
Dig Deeper
The Backstory
A non-core sale sharpens the Sportradar thesis
Sportradar’s US$170 million sale of Atrium Sports lands at a point when investors are pressing online betting suppliers to prove focus, cash discipline and defensible growth. The buyer, Teamworks Innovations, is taking a business centered on team-facing tools such as video analysis, scouting, coaching and player evaluation. Sportradar is keeping video production, graphics development and computer-vision technology, underscoring that the divestiture is less a retreat from sports technology than a pruning of assets outside its core betting, gaming and media strategy.
That distinction matters because Sportradar has spent much of the past year trying to persuade the market that its data rights, artificial intelligence tools and distribution relationships can support higher pricing and wider margins. The Atrium transaction gives management fresh capital while narrowing the story to businesses investors already understand: official data, betting products, media services and adjacent technology. Jefferies analyst David Katz framed the sale as a positive because it monetizes a non-core asset at more than 10 times cash flow and improves flexibility for buybacks or selective acquisitions.
Investor day set the growth framework
The latest transaction follows an April investor day that positioned Sportradar as a scaled infrastructure provider to the global sports betting economy. The company brought out league and operator figures, including DraftKings CEO Jason Robins, NBA Commissioner Adam Silver and NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman, but analysts focused less on star power than on management’s long-range targets. As reported in Complete iGaming’s coverage of Sportradar’s investor day, executives projected revenue of €2 billion through 2026 and outlined a path to sustained growth tied to higher-value products, live betting and broader customer penetration.
The strategic pitch rested on operating leverage. Sportradar said customers buying three products produced twice the revenue of single-product customers. Analysts also highlighted automation. The company has used AI to collect data on more than half the games it covers, producing major savings compared with human collection, while also improving internal coding productivity. That matters for a company whose costs include expensive rights and technology investments: The more it can automate collection and repurpose data across products, the more incremental revenue should fall to cash flow.
At that event, management also linked its opportunity to sports betting’s shift toward in-play and proposition wagering. J.P. Morgan analyst Samuel Nielsen noted that every percentage-point increase in U.S. prop betting could mean €6 million for Sportradar. The company also pointed to igaming as a US$10 billion addressable market, with 84 icasino brands already using its services. The Atrium sale, in that context, reinforces the same message: capital and management attention are being directed toward businesses that scale with betting activity, customer acquisition and media engagement.
Prediction markets became the new swing factor
The clearest change in Sportradar’s narrative has been the emergence of prediction markets as both opportunity and risk. In June, the company announced a global, nonexclusive agreement with Kalshi, giving the event-contract platform access to Sportradar data streams from Major League Baseball, the National Hockey League, Major League Soccer and the Ultimate Fighting Championship. The agreement, discussed in analyst reaction to the Sportradar-Kalshi deal, also allows Sportradar to sublicense data to Kalshi clients, including bookmakers and market makers.
That sublicensing feature widened the perceived opportunity beyond a single exchange. Analysts said market makers could become a larger revenue pool than exchanges if prediction markets develop deeper liquidity and more sophisticated trading structures. Katz described the economics as a mix of fixed-fee services, such as integrity and customer acquisition, and variable revenue tied to trading volume for data, odds and visualization. Because Kalshi can integrate Sportradar data much like existing betting customers, analysts saw limited incremental startup costs.
The risk is regulatory. Prediction markets have been controversial because sports event contracts can resemble traditional sports wagers while operating under a different legal framework. Micro-betting would sharpen that tension, potentially allowing highly granular sports contracts that look similar to in-play betting. A hostile court ruling, a shift in federal policy or state-level resistance could limit the category. Even so, the Kalshi deal showed why Sportradar has sought exposure: The company can sell infrastructure without necessarily taking the same balance-sheet or customer-liability risks as operators.
Polymarket and the NFL added evidence of demand
Two August developments further supported the view that Sportradar remains embedded in key parts of the sports data and betting ecosystem. Polymarket expanded its relationship with the company, adding sports data, live odds, audiovisual content, fan engagement, marketing and integrity services across properties including the Bundesliga, EuroLeague Basketball, Chinese Basketball Association, National Basketball League, Tennis Grand Slams and UTR Pro events. As outlined in Complete iGaming’s report on the Polymarket expansion and NFL sportsbook changes, the arrangement built on an earlier set of covered properties that included the UFC, MLB, NFL, MLS and ATP Tour.
The second development came from the NFL, which ended its relationship with Caesars Sportsbook, added Fanatics Sportsbook and renewed with FanDuel and DraftKings. The league’s core data rights remain with Genius Sports, limiting the direct read-through for Sportradar. But analysts viewed the announcement as evidence that leagues and operators still value a broad supplier network for data, advertising, intellectual property and fan engagement. Katz said the developments could ease worries that Sportradar might be disintermediated as leagues, sportsbooks and prediction platforms negotiate more directly.
Those concerns have weighed on the stock. In August, Katz maintained a “Hold” rating and a US$14 price target when Sportradar traded around US$12.95. He said prediction markets could generate revenue in the tens of millions in 2026, with a larger effect in 2027. The Atrium sale adds a different kind of support: cash that is not dependent on regulatory outcomes, trading volumes or league approvals.
A difficult stock backdrop shapes capital choices
Sportradar’s divestiture also has to be read against a broader bear market for online betting and igaming equities. In April, Katz wrote that online sports betting and igaming stocks were down 35% for the year, with investor sentiment clouded by prediction-market uncertainty and questions about consumer demand. In his assessment of moderate optimism for online betting stocks, he kept bullish views on DraftKings and Sportradar but acknowledged that Sportradar shares had fallen almost 35% since Jan. 1.
The bear case around Sportradar has included concerns about gray-market exposure and whether the company is stretching beyond its core online sports betting business. Katz has called the gray-market concern overstated and said prediction markets and igaming are not yet reflected in his estimates. Still, valuation compression changes the capital-allocation debate. If shares trade well below prior cash-flow multiples, buybacks can become more attractive than acquisitions, especially after an all-cash asset sale.
That is why Katz’s recommendation that management prioritize repurchases is important. Sportradar already had substantial authorization for buybacks, and the Atrium proceeds add dry powder. While management has continued to describe mergers and acquisitions as part of its long-term strategy, the company has signaled selectivity, favoring assets that strengthen betting, gaming, media and technology rather than widening the corporate perimeter.
The stake is a cleaner growth story
The Atrium sale does not solve every question facing Sportradar. Prediction markets remain legally unsettled. Sports betting handle growth has moderated in some markets. League-rights economics can be expensive and competitive. Igaming expansion depends on regulation, especially in the United States, where legalization has moved slowly. But the transaction improves the company’s ability to argue that it is concentrating resources where it has the greatest advantage.
Peers show why that distinction matters. Rush Street Interactive has drawn analyst support because of a consistent igaming-led model, strong Latin American growth and disciplined capital allocation, as described in Jefferies’ renewed confidence in Rush Street Interactive. Sportradar’s model is different: It sells picks-and-shovels infrastructure to sportsbooks, media companies, leagues and now prediction-market platforms. Its challenge is to show that this model can produce recurring growth without excessive reinvestment.
By selling Atrium, Sportradar gives investors a clearer way to judge that proposition. The company is raising cash, shedding a peripheral asset and retaining technology that supports its core products. In a sector where new verticals can blur strategy and regulation can quickly change the outlook, simplicity has value. The next test is whether management uses the proceeds in a way that reinforces the case for higher returns, whether through buybacks, debt capacity or targeted deals that deepen its core data and betting ecosystem.










