CasinoRIX buys Innovate Change to enter New Zealand

Dig Deeper

Related stories

2025/07/14: SharpLink Gaming buys US$25.7 million in Ethereum 2025/04/07: New Zealand tribal leaders call for pause to online gambling changes 2025/06/24: New Zealand opens register of interest for prospective online operators 2025/07/15: New Zealand online gambling legalization bill clears first hurdle

The Backstory

Momentum builds behind a regulated online market

New Zealand’s push to bring offshore gambling onshore has accelerated this year, with the government moving from concept to legislation and market signaling. A landmark legalization bill cleared its first reading in Parliament, setting up a framework for up to 15 online casino licenses and promising stricter player safeguards, ad limits and penalties for violators. Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden positioned the plan as a pragmatic response to an unregulated status quo where New Zealanders can already access thousands of sites without local oversight. The bill’s architecture leans on licensing standards, mandatory age checks and a required contribution to the Problem Gambling Levy, with the Department of Internal Affairs tasked to oversee enforcement and recover costs through operator fees.

The early legislative win signaled intent: Wellington wants to replace a gray market with a monitored one and reclaim some control over a fast-expanding digital sector. But it also opened a deep debate over who benefits and who bears the risk as gambling migrates from pubs and clubs to phones. The stakes span consumer protection, public finance and industry competition, with Parliament’s select committee process now the arena where those trade-offs are being tested.

Blueprint takes shape as regulators court operators

Officials are already laying the groundwork for implementation. The Department of Internal Affairs launched a register of interest for prospective licensees, inviting operators to engage early as the regulatory design is finalized. Trina Lowry, who leads the Online Gambling Implementation Programme, cast the outreach as a practical step to ensure the system is clear and efficient ahead of a planned 2026 launch. Under the bill, licensed operators would, for the first time, be able to advertise in New Zealand, a shift meant to channel play toward supervised brands.

The register also telegraphs to the market that compliance readiness will matter. Regulators have emphasized harm prevention strategies, transparent compliance histories and robust age verification as baseline conditions for entry. The government’s timetable anticipates competitive licensing and the introduction of strict standards in tandem with new advertising permissions, aiming to flip incentives so that supervision and consumer tools become competitive features rather than afterthoughts.

Industry players are already positioning. While the bill does not pick winners, the expectation is that well-capitalized, often offshore incumbents will be among the most prepared to meet the bar and scale quickly once licenses are available.

Community funding gap becomes the flashpoint

The fiercest criticism targets what is not in the bill. New Zealand’s gambling law has long required a “community return” from gaming machine operators, who must channel at least 40% of revenue after taxes and levies into sports, cultural groups and charities. That model delivered NZ$345 million in grants last year. By contrast, the online bill imposes a 12% gaming tax and the problem gambling levy but omits a community grants obligation for licensed online casinos. As more wagering moves online, local clubs and nonprofits fear a funding cliff.

That concern has galvanized submissions to Parliament. According to one account, more than 5,000 comments have urged lawmakers to add a community return requirement, warning that an NZ$800 million online market could siphon spend without replenishing the grassroots ecosystem that land-based gambling has historically supported. Whether ministers will amend the bill remains uncertain, but the political signal is clear: there is broad public expectation that digital operators should carry similar social obligations as their physical counterparts.

The community return debate cuts to the policy core. If the bill aims to tame a gray market and reduce harm, backers argue, it must also prevent public-good erosion as activity re-platforms. Opponents of a mandatory return counter that online economics and international competition require a different tax and levy mix. The compromise lawmakers craft will determine where profits flow and how resilient community sport and services are as consumer behavior shifts.

Māori leaders press pause over harm and treaty concerns

Beyond funding, social risk and treaty obligations are intensifying scrutiny. The Online Safety Iwi Leaders Group has called for a pause to the licensing rollout, warning that offshore-led models could deepen gambling harms, particularly among Māori communities. Leaders argue the framework, as drafted, lacks robust mechanisms to honor Te Tiriti o Waitangi and to ensure that profits cycle back into affected communities. They want more research into harm, stronger mitigation and explicit avenues for community benefit before licenses are auctioned.

Officials have responded that both the offshore and problem gambling levies will apply and that public input will be central through select committee hearings later this year. Still, the iwi leaders’ intervention raises the political cost of moving too fast and frames harm reduction as more than compliance checklists. It asks whether a regulatory model built around international operators can credibly address localized risks and obligations if revenue largely exits the country.

The government’s timetable—licenses beginning in 2026—gives room for recalibration. But it also risks a vacuum in the interim, with unlicensed sites still active and enforcement tools limited until the new regime is in place.

Market realigns as affiliates and enforcers set their stakes

The industry is reshaping ahead of regulation. CasinoRIX, a global review platform, bought New Zealand-based Innovate Change in a bid to localize coverage and expand responsible gambling content as it eyes a regulated future. The deal, detailed in CasinoRIX’s acquisition announcement, keeps Innovate Change’s editorial and operations teams intact while integrating the site into a broader affiliate network. The move suggests global players anticipate a licensed market and want trusted local voices to navigate licensing, payments and promotions for New Zealanders.

Regulators have been active as well. The Department of Internal Affairs recently fined four social media influencers for illegal promotion of overseas casinos, signaling a tougher line on marketing that skirts existing advertising bans. That enforcement posture could continue as the government seeks to steer activity toward compliant operators and rein in gray-market visibility ahead of licensing.

Globally, capital flows underscore the sector’s technology tilt. U.S.-listed affiliate SharpLink Gaming bought US$25.7 million in Ethereum to use as a primary treasury asset, a move its leadership cast as a long-term bet on blockchain’s role in digital ecosystems. While not specific to New Zealand, the transaction highlights how igaming intermediaries are aligning with crypto infrastructure, a factor New Zealand regulators may weigh as they craft rules around payments, custody and advertising in a market that increasingly converges with fintech.

What to watch as Parliament tests the trade-offs

The select committee stage will determine whether the bill’s social architecture expands to include mandatory community returns and stronger harm controls tailored to at-risk groups. The Department of Internal Affairs’ operator engagement points to an on-time launch in 2026, but iwi objections and public feedback could slow or reshape the licensing blueprint. Meanwhile, affiliates and would-be licensees are building New Zealand footprints, betting that a regulated channel will reward early compliance and local credibility.

The core questions remain straightforward and high stakes: Can New Zealand convert an unregulated online market into a safer, accountable system without hollowing out community funding or widening harm? And if offshore operators emerge as early winners, what guarantees will exist to keep profits, protections and obligations aligned with the communities where the risks are borne? The answers will set the contours of the country’s digital gambling economy for years.