Booming Games hit with CA$70,000 penalty by AGCO over prohibited auto-play feature
Casino game provider Booming Games has been handed a CA$70,000 (US$50,849)1 CAD = 0.7264 USD
2026-08-21Powered by CMG CurrenShift penalty by Ontario’s gambling regulator, the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO), after a banned auto-play feature was made available to players in Ontario and enabled across several games for a period of months.
The AGCO found that Booming Games had fallen short of its responsibility to appropriately design, test and monitor its titles to ensure they comply with the province’s gambling standards, serving the studio with an Order of Monetary Penalty.
The auto-play feature, which allows players to set online slot games to run multiple spins without manually starting each one, is not permitted in Ontario because the regulator requires players to actively initiate each bet.
This rule is intended to introduce breaks between wagers, giving players the opportunity to consider their gambling and spending habits, decrease extended and continuous play, and minimize the risk of gambling-related harm.
The AGCO discovered the issue through its compliance monitoring program. The regulator then informed Booming Games and the functionality for the affected titles was removed.
The CEO and Registrar of the AGCO, Dr Karin Schnarr, said, “Ontario’s game design standards are fundamental player-protection measures built into the regulated igaming market – they are not optional technical requirements. Registered suppliers must have effective controls in place to prevent prohibited features from reaching Ontario players. When those safeguards are not respected, the AGCO will take regulatory action.”
Ontario’s regulated online gambling market, which opened in April 2022, enforces strict game-design standards that prohibit auto-play, require minimum time between spins and ban features that can obscure or reframe losses as wins.
Booming Games has 15 days to request a hearing before the Licence Appeal Tribunal, an independent body within Tribunals Ontario, to challenge the Order of Monetary Penalty.
Dig Deeper
Related stories
The Backstory
Ontario’s rule book moves from market launch to enforcement
Ontario’s latest penalty against Booming Games fits a broader regulatory pattern that has developed since the province opened its regulated online gambling market in April 2022. The Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario has moved beyond licensing and market-building into a phase defined by detailed compliance reviews, targeted penalties and a steady emphasis on player protection.
The issue in the Booming Games case was not a headline-grabbing marketing campaign or a disputed payout. It was a game-design function: auto-play. Ontario prohibits the feature because it allows slot play to continue without a player manually initiating each wager. The regulator’s position is that requiring a fresh action before each bet creates a pause, however brief, that can help reduce continuous play and give players time to reconsider spending.
That places the case in the technical core of Ontario’s internet gaming standards. The regulator has treated design mechanics, marketing language, affiliate conduct and bonus terms as part of the same consumer-protection framework. The message is that compliance is not limited to operators that hold the customer relationship. Suppliers whose software reaches Ontario players also are expected to build, test and monitor products for the province’s specific rules.
Game mechanics are under the same scrutiny as promotions
The Booming Games penalty shows how Ontario’s standards reach into the architecture of online casino products. Auto-play is common in some markets, where players can set a number of spins to run automatically. In Ontario, that convenience collides with rules designed to slow the cadence of gambling and prevent features that normalize extended sessions.
That scrutiny comes as suppliers are trying to make digital slots more engaging and more familiar to players who move between land-based casinos and mobile apps. A recent industry discussion on bringing stepper slots online captured the commercial pressure. Executives from IGT, AGS and Light & Wonder described demand for simple, nostalgic games that preserve the feel of casino floors while being optimized for mobile screens, jackpots and omnichannel play.
The regulatory tension is clear. Suppliers want games that are frictionless, familiar and capable of retaining players in a crowded lobby. Regulators want mechanics that avoid excessive speed, obscure losses or reduce conscious decision-making. In Ontario, a feature that may be routine elsewhere can become a compliance failure if it undermines standards requiring players to actively initiate each bet.
That makes localization more than a language, currency or certification exercise. It requires product teams to understand jurisdiction-specific limits on spin timing, presentation, bonus framing and player interaction. The Booming Games matter indicates that the AGCO expects suppliers to catch those issues before products go live, not after monitoring detects a prohibited function.
Marketing penalties set the tone before supplier action
The regulator’s supplier action follows a series of operator-focused cases that established the AGCO’s willingness to penalize conduct it views as increasing consumer risk. In one case, BetMGM Canada received a CA$110,000 fine after marketing partners offered cash inducements to members of the public who opened accounts and deposited funds.
That matter was important because it reinforced two principles. First, Ontario bars operators from publicly advertising bonuses and inducements to prospective customers in ways that breach the standards. Second, operators are accountable for third parties acting on their behalf. The regulator cited affiliate conduct at public events and through marketing activity, making clear that outsourcing customer acquisition does not outsource responsibility.
The same logic helps explain why the Booming Games case carries broader significance for suppliers. Ontario’s regime distributes accountability across the market. Operators cannot blame affiliates for prohibited promotions. Suppliers cannot rely on the fact that their games were distributed through licensed operators if the games themselves contain banned features. Each registered participant is expected to maintain controls appropriate to its role.
The AGCO’s public enforcement language has been consistent: registered companies must operate in the public interest, meet the standards and protect Ontarians on regulated sites. Monetary penalties are one tool to reinforce that expectation. Companies facing such orders generally have the right to challenge them before the Licence Appeal Tribunal, but the public notice itself signals the regulator’s priorities to the rest of the market.
Bonus design has become another risk point
Ontario’s enforcement posture also has focused on whether gambling promotions are understandable and reasonably attainable. The AGCO’s CA$54,000 penalty against Casino Days, operated by Well Played Media, centered on a welcome bonus that the regulator found was deceptive and encouraged high-risk behavior.
In that case, the AGCO examined a CA$2,000 bonus that required a matching CA$2,000 deposit and CA$70,000 in wagering within seven days, with individual bets capped at CA$5. The regulator said key terms were not adequately disclosed and were buried behind multiple links. Its analysis suggested an average player might lose about CA$3,640 while trying to secure the full offer.
The connection to game design is not incidental. Bonuses, free spins and slot features all shape the pace and perception of play. The growth of promotional mechanics in North America shows why regulators are paying attention. DraftKings, for example, recently introduced Flex Spins for online casino customers, a feature allowing eligible users to redeem promotional spins across more than 100 slot titles rather than a narrow game set.
Such products reflect where the market is heading: more personalization, more choice and more promotional flexibility. But in Ontario, those tools must be assessed against standards that limit inducements, require clear disclosure and discourage high-risk gambling. A promotion that is innovative in one jurisdiction may require substantial adjustment in another.
A crowded content market raises the compliance burden
The commercial stakes are high because online casino operators are competing through content volume, exclusives and branded games. In New Jersey, Games Global recently expanded its Hard Rock Digital partnership with an exclusive Hard Rock Bet Casino slot, adding a branded title with bonus wheels, free spins and jackpot-style features to a platform with thousands of games.
That type of deal illustrates how suppliers and operators use distinctive mechanics to stand out. Exclusive content can deepen a customer relationship and help a casino app differentiate itself from rivals offering many of the same third-party titles. It also adds operational complexity. Each new feature, modifier, bonus round or spin mechanic must be assessed under the rules of every jurisdiction where the game is offered.
Ontario’s approach makes that process especially important. The market has generated substantial revenue since launch and remains Canada’s only live regulated online gaming market. Its scale gives suppliers and operators a strong incentive to participate, but the regulator has shown that access comes with close oversight. Compliance monitoring can identify issues months after a game or promotion goes live, creating financial, reputational and operational risk.
The Booming Games penalty therefore is not only about one prohibited feature. It is a reminder that product governance must keep pace with market expansion. As studios adapt land-based formats for digital play, build promotional spin tools and develop branded slot experiences, they must also maintain jurisdiction-specific controls capable of blocking noncompliant functions before they reach players. In Ontario, the AGCO has made clear that technical design choices are player-protection choices, and failures can carry consequences across the supply chain.
